Teams

CGuinn (CT&P)

2023 Combo Doubles 65 & Over League · 65 & Over 6.5 Women - Fri AM

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-10-06vs SJohnson (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesWilma Pinter / Gillian Murrell vs Delane Lovelace / Judy Knechtel6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJoan Slep / Kay Dugan vs Celia Stallings / Elizabeth Hollidge6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-09-22vs SStover (Southampton)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesWilma Pinter / Gillian Murrell vs Denise Bost / Lisa O'Shea3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoan Slep / Nancy Wasulko vs Valerie Link / Janet Janda6-0, 5-7, 0-1
2023-09-15vs SJohnson (Weddington)Won 20
W#2 DoublesKate Blankenship / Gillian Murrell vs Delane Lovelace / Judy Knechtel6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJoan Slep / Margaret Hiller vs Faye Childress / Gayle Gold1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-01vs SStover (Southampton)Won 10
W#1 DoublesWilma Pinter / Gillian Murrell vs Susie McCraney / Pamela Hatch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2023-08-25vs SJohnson (Weddington)Won 10
W#1 DoublesGillian Murrell / Kate Blankenship vs Marla Horvath / Nanette Murphy6-1, 6-3
2023-08-11vs SStover (Southampton)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesPatty Halvorsen / Gillian Murrell vs Janet Janda / Valerie Link1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJoan Slep / Carol Guinn vs Janice Daniel / Susie McCraney1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 65 & Over 6.5 Women - Fri AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Karen Trigg
published
3.01
Kate Blankenship
published
2.99
Patty Kahle
published
2.95
Joan Slep
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
Gillian Murrell
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.82
Dianne Petrosino
published 3
2.55
Maureen Genser
published
2.51
Kay Dugan
published
2.38
Carol Guinn
published 3
Patty Halvorsen
published
Wilma Pinter
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gillian Murrell + Joan Slep8550% games−7.9% vs expected
Dianne Petrosino + Wilma Pinter213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karen Trigg
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.06
Kate Blankenship
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
3.01
Patty Kahle
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
2.99
3.5
Joan Slep
50W–54L career · 4 lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.95
3
Gillian Murrell
49W–54L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%70%30%
2.92
3
Dianne Petrosino
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%10%
2.82
Maureen Genser
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
2.55
Kay Dugan
0W–4L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Carol Guinn
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
2.38
Patty Halvorsen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Wilma Pinter
4W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.