Teams

Woodlake Phelps

2024 Richmond Mixed 40 & Over · Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-08vs ACAC TownsendSplit 11
L#1 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Matthew Loman vs Kim Martin / John Kosco4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Thomas Brown vs Anne Townsend / Joey Townsend7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-28vs Avalon GhitaLost 01
L#1 DoublesPeter Monstello / Irene Shepherd vs Donna Wade / Todd Milligan2-6, 3-6
2024-06-24vs Raintree HeinsLost 01
L#2 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Dan Joyce vs Kathi Ford / Jared Gnazzo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-19vs Burkwood-BrockWon 10
W#1 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Dan Joyce vs Kimberley Dages / Nat Cross7-6, 6-3
2024-06-12vs HCC-TindelWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatthew Loman / Sandra Bavaro vs Meredith Thompson / Stuart Thompson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-06-11vs MTC Honey Badgers - CutlipLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Bavaro / William McConnell vs Allie Hannon / Jimmy Biringer3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Walter Weiskopf vs Wendy Learn / Sandeep Mamunuri1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-31vs Kanawha WareWon 20
W#2 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Peter Monstello vs Casey Hill / Stacey Hill6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesWalter Weiskopf / Sandra Bavaro vs Eric Miller / Cheryl Ware6-4, 7-6
2024-05-15vs ACAC TownsendLost 02
L#1 DoublesSandra Bavaro / Thomas Brown vs Anne Townsend / John Kosco6-0, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesIrene Shepherd / Dan Joyce vs Kim Martin / Daryl Jones6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Mixed 40 & Over 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Irene Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Thomas Brown
published
2.89
Jeanean Phelps
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.86
Lisa Giangregorio
published
2.84
Sandra Bavaro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.76
Dan Joyce
published 3
2.64
William McConnell
published
2.63
Walter Weiskopf
published
2.51
Alison Joyce
published 3
Matthew Loman
published
Meaco Coffey
published
Peter Monstello
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Irene Shepherd
109W–81L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Thomas Brown
2W–10L career · no lines in 2024
39%61%<1%
3.04
Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Lisa Giangregorio
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
Sandra Bavaro
128W–124L career · 4 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Dan Joyce
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
2.76
William McConnell
11W–11L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.64
Walter Weiskopf
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
17%82%<1%
2.63
3
Alison Joyce
2W–28L career · no lines in 2024
48%52%<1%
2.51
Matthew Loman
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meaco Coffey
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Peter Monstello
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.