Teams

Western: All about the Base-liners

2025 18&Over Mixed · 7.0

19 players · average NTRP 3.57 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule14 played
2025-03-21vs No Fault ZoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesAnna Hill / Sungjoon Park vs Jenny Barnett / Joel Podkaminer6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSeneca Thomas / Emily Madan vs Chris Milner / Kathleen Jordan6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMinseok Lee / Irina Naydich vs You Soon Baek / David Smith6-1, 6-3
2025-03-14vs No Fault ZoneLost 03
L#1 DoublesSungjoon Park / Natasha Mariano vs J Shermeta / Kuniko Okada3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGalib Braschler / Heather Harrick vs Michelle Cannon / John Tilitz2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMinseok Lee / Jenna Holmes vs You Soon Baek / Jarrell Puryear3-6, 2-6
2025-03-07vs No Fault ZoneLost 12
L#1 DoublesIrina Naydich / Seneca Thomas vs J Shermeta / Aija Leiponen5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadi Maley / Vivek Srikrishnan vs Chris Milner / Ashley Paolangeli1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKyoungsoo Lee / Sanchay Madan vs Joel Podkaminer / Dewi Rainey2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Madan / Sanchay Madan vs Laure Weaver / Isaac Weissmann3-6, 2-6
2025-02-28vs No Fault ZoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesMeredith Holgerson / Felipe Ortiz vs Mizuho Okada / Dewi Rainey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesHaiyuan Yu / Vivian Zayas vs Marcus Smolka / Aija Leiponen7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesMark Poor / Kyoungsoo Lee vs Kaiya Bercow / Susan Cole5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-02-21vs No Fault ZoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesNam-Jung Kim / Madi Maley vs Jarrell Puryear / Aija Leiponen6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeather Harrick / Galib Braschler vs John Tilitz / Jenny Barnett3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSanchay Madan / Natasha Mariano vs Chris Milner / Kathleen Jordan6-4, 6-3
2025-02-14vs No Fault ZoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesSeneca Thomas / Vivian Zayas vs Mizuho Okada / Dewi Rainey2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesEmily Madan / Sungjoon Park vs Aija Leiponen / Jarrell Puryear6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesIrina Naydich / Minseok Lee vs Kathleen Jordan / J Shermeta0-6, 3-6
2025-02-10vs No Fault ZoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesNatasha Mariano / Felipe Ortiz vs Mizuho Okada / Susan Cole6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMadi Maley / Haiyuan Yu vs J Shermeta / Jenny Barnett6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesEmily Madan / Vivek Srikrishnan vs David Smith / Kuniko Okada6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-31vs No Fault ZoneLost 03
L#1 DoublesNatasha Mariano / Nam-Jung Kim vs Susan Cole / Mizuho Okada2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMeredith Holgerson / Galib Braschler vs Ashley Paolangeli / J Shermeta6-7, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMark Poor / Jenna Holmes vs Michelle Cannon / Chris Milner1-6, 1-6
2025-01-20vs No Fault ZoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesMadi Maley / Haiyuan Yu vs Aija Leiponen / Jarrell Puryear6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesSungjoon Park / Emily Madan vs Kathleen Jordan / Joel Podkaminer6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSanchay Madan / Jenna Holmes vs You Soon Baek / David Smith6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2025-01-19vs CrandallSplit 11
W#2 DoublesEmily Madan / Krishna Chakravadhanula vs Kirill Kobyakov / Kayla Davis7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesEmily Esther / Sanchay Madan vs Leo O'Connor / Brenda Myers2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-01-13vs No Fault ZoneWon 21
W#1 DoublesNam-Jung Kim / Vivian Zayas vs Mizuho Okada / Laura Falk7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSeneca Thomas / Anna Hill vs Ben Frahm / Kuniko Okada6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesVivek Srikrishnan / Kyoungsoo Lee vs Kaiya Bercow / Michelle Cannon6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2025-01-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesCorey Layton / Emily Madan vs Matthew Lange / Ali Krowiak3-6, 0-6
2024-12-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesEmily Madan / Corey Layton vs Barbara Mirch / Michael Buglione6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: All about the Base-liners73191128259
2No Fault Zone37111943304

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Nam-Jung Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Felipe Ortiz
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.71
Vivian Zayas
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.58
Emily Madan
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.48
Madi Maley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.44
Haiyuan Yu
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.44
Natasha Mariano
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.42
Seneca Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.35
Sanchay Madan
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Anna Hill
published 3.5
Galib Braschler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.24
Mark Poor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.22
Minseok Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Irina Naydich
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.15
Heather Harrick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Kyoungsoo Lee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Sungjoon Park
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Jenna Holmes
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Meredith Holgerson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Madan + Sanchay Madan3739% gamesnot enough data
Haiyuan Yu + Vivian Zayas6164% gamesnot enough data
Heather Harrick + Galib Braschler2340% gamesnot enough data
Kyoungsoo Lee + Sungjoon Park044 matchesnot enough data
Nam-Jung Kim + Vivian Zayas404 matchesnot enough data
Irina Naydich + Haiyuan Yu213 matchesnot enough data
Haiyuan Yu + Madi Maley213 matchesnot enough data
Nam-Jung Kim + Madi Maley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nam-Jung Kim
62W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
3.85
4
Felipe Ortiz
20W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Vivian Zayas
59W–15L career · 5 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Emily Madan
132W–60L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.58
Madi Maley
39W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Haiyuan Yu
66W–49L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.44
Natasha Mariano
8W–6L career · 4 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.44
Seneca Thomas
18W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.42
Sanchay Madan
27W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.35
3.5
Anna Hill
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Galib Braschler
25W–32L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Poor
2W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.24
Minseok Lee
7W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
3.22
3.5
Irina Naydich
40W–57L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Heather Harrick
26W–48L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.15
Kyoungsoo Lee
24W–46L career · 3 lines in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Sungjoon Park
36W–43L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.10
Jenna Holmes
19W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Meredith Holgerson
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.