Teams

Volley Llamas 40

Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women's

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-03-27vs SAZ 40/3.0 W- Selina KellyLost 04
L#1 DoublesMargot M Ellis / JANET UTECHT vs Elizabeth Duemmel / Tracy Rea2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLisa Knight vs Kerstin Harper3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Roberts / Gudrun Weaver vs Czarina Astengo / Dinora Apodaca2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Block / Holly Monka vs Monica Tapia Barcelo / Kim Usher1-6, 2-6
2026-03-20vs Not My FaultLost 04
L#1 DoublesLois Miller / Lisa Knight vs Lynn Sherer / Amy Beiter1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHolly Monka vs Linnea Dickey2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnita Mischuk / Karen Roberts vs Kim Sasser / Olympia Tinsley1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStacy Mills / Adrienne Crump vs Michelle Tian / Katja Fritzsche3-6, 4-6
2026-03-06vs SAZ 40/3.0 W- Selina KellyLost 04
L#1 DoublesMargot M Ellis / Stacy Mills vs Natalie Carey / Tracy Rea2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLois Miller vs Elizabeth Duemmel3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Knight / JANET UTECHT vs Czarina Astengo / Selina Kelly6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Anderson / Adrienne Crump vs Dana Goldstein / Caroline Kacer3-6, 0-6
2026-02-28vs Not My FaultLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargot M Ellis / JANET UTECHT vs Michelle Valvo / Karen Yaffe6-2, 6-4
L#1 SinglesGudrun Weaver vs Juliet McKenna0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesHolly Monka / Rebecca Block vs Lynn Sherer / Michelle Tian3-6, 2-6
2026-02-14vs SAZ 40/3.0 W- Selina KellyLost 13
W#1 DoublesStacy Mills / Margot M Ellis vs Selina Kelly / Elizabeth Duemmel6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesHolly Monka vs Tracy Rea0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Knight / Anita Mischuk vs Dana Goldstein / Virkine Weitman4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLois Miller / Rebecca Block vs Adreana Gandara / Nita Jain7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2026-02-08vs SAZ 40/3.0 W- Selina KellyLost 04
L#1 DoublesAnita Mischuk / Gudrun Weaver vs Elizabeth Duemmel / Selina Kelly2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJANET UTECHT vs Tracy Rea4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Knight / Karen Roberts vs Kim Usher / Virkine Weitman1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDebbie Anderson / Rebecca Block vs Czarina Astengo / Caroline Kacer6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-02-06vs Not My FaultLost 04
L#1 DoublesGudrun Weaver / Stacy Mills vs Linda Barrows / Michelle Valvo0-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnita Mischuk vs Hannah Dillon0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJANET UTECHT / Debbie Anderson vs Juliet McKenna / Andrea Gerlak4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesRebecca Block / Adrienne Crump vs Mary Palazzo / Amy Beiter1-6, 1-6
2026-01-17vs Not My FaultLost 04
L#1 DoublesGudrun Weaver / Stacy Mills vs Hannah Dillon / Michelle Valvo2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJANET UTECHT vs Juliet McKenna1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLisa Knight / Debbie Anderson vs Linda Barrows / Linnea Dickey3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLois Miller / Margot M Ellis vs Karen Yaffe / Alisha Severson6-1, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women's have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.65 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.86
Kathryn Verna
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Margot M Ellis
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.84
Stacy Mills
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.77
Lois Miller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.70
Anita Mischuk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.68
Rebecca Block
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
JANET UTECHT
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.57
Holly Monka
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.56
Lisa Knight
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.51
Gudrun Weaver
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.21
Adrienne Crump
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Karen Roberts
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rebecca Block + Anita Mischuk3251% games+2.1% vs expected
Holly Monka + Adrienne Crump1626% games−12.2% vs expected
Anita Mischuk + Gudrun Weaver1441% gamesnot enough data
JANET UTECHT + Lisa Knight1441% gamesnot enough data
Gudrun Weaver + Lisa Knight1434% gamesnot enough data
Karen Roberts + Lisa Knight134 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Block + Adrienne Crump134 matchesnot enough data
Anita Mischuk + Lisa Knight224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathryn Verna
28W–28L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
2.86
Margot M Ellis
7W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Stacy Mills
29W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
2.84
Lois Miller
4W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Anita Mischuk
34W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
Rebecca Block
17W–60L career · 5 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
2.68
3
JANET UTECHT
31W–52L career · 6 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
2.66
3
Holly Monka
8W–33L career · type A · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.57
Lisa Knight
11W–25L career · 6 lines in 2026
33%67%<1%
2.56
3
Gudrun Weaver
5W–29L career · 5 lines in 2026
48%52%<1%
2.51
2.5
Adrienne Crump
3W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.21
Karen Roberts
16W–26L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.