Teams

HCC Vamos - J. Orsini

2023 Hillsborough Adult 18 & Over ESL · 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men

10 players · average NTRP 4.17 / REGION_3

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-12-20vs Saddlebrook - L. BarbettaLost 01
L#2 DoublesJoshua Luo / Elvin Vargas vs Larry Barbetta / Vinicius de Souza1-6, 4-6
2022-12-02Lost 01
L#2 DoublesElvin Vargas / Michael Quinn vs Jeffrey Biezunski / Bryant Moore1-6, 2-6
2022-11-12Lost 01
L#2 DoublesGrant Garlick / Elvin Vargas vs Jimmy Hayes / Jim Hayes3-6, 3-6
2022-10-23vs West Meadows - C. KarkourLost 01
L#1 DoublesElvin Vargas / Enrique Escobar vs John Williams / Ronald March2-6, 3-6
2022-10-11Won 10
W#2 DoublesChris New / Elvin Vargas vs Roger Bensinger / Albert Alhadeff6-4, 6-4
2022-10-08Lost 01
L#1 DoublesElvin Vargas / Gunnar Nelson vs Brian Hodapp / David Palmer1-6, 3-6
2022-10-04Lost 01
L#3 DoublesGrant Garlick / Elvin Vargas vs Eugene Martineau / Paul Williams4-6, 0-6
2022-09-24vs Buckhorn Bad News Bucks - J. TorresSplit 11
L#1 DoublesEnrique Escobar / Jaime Villegas vs Jason Lee / David Bounds2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesChris New / Elvin Vargas vs Nick Crim / Jarrod Dargahi7-5, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Chris New
published 4.5
Hugo Rodriguez
published 4.5
3.90
Grant Garlick
published 4
3.90
Sebastian Graba
published
3.84
Gunnar Nelson
published 4
3.77
Joshua Luo
published
3.74
John Hockin
published
3.71
Jaime Villegas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.65
Elvin Vargas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.62
Tu Phan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elvin Vargas + Jaime Villegas3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris New
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Hugo Rodriguez
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Grant Garlick
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.90
Sebastian Graba
28W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Gunnar Nelson
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
Joshua Luo
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
John Hockin
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Jaime Villegas
129W–65L career · 1 line in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Elvin Vargas
127W–111L career · 8 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Tu Phan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.