Teams

ESB:Richardson

2022 VT Tri-Level Women · 3.5 Women

4 players · average NTRP 3.50 / VERMONT

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2022-12-03vs EE:Morgan-Yatzor/SamterWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Maura Wygmans vs Peggy Cohen / Lynn Bursell2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-11-30vs OC:The Diehards:Yost/FoulkWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Maura Wygmans vs Kathy Yost / Rebecca Foulk6-0, 6-1
2022-11-13vs OC:The Diehards:Yost/FoulkWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim McManus / Lori Roberts vs Judith Jackson / Rebecca Foulk6-1, 6-2
2022-11-13vs MIT:MarshallWon 10
W#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Maura Wygmans vs Janis Bark / Peggy Clement6-7, 7-6, 1-0
2022-11-08vs MIT:MarshallWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim McManus / Maura Wygmans vs Janis Bark / Peggy Clement7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-11-06vs ESB:StrausserLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Kim McManus vs Jennifer Weiss / Margaret Limoge2-6, 4-6
2022-11-05vs EE:Morgan-Yatzor/SamterWon 10
W#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Jeanne Blackmore vs Deidre Riehle / Peggy Cohen6-1, 6-1
2022-10-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesLori Roberts / Kim McManus vs Mary Kirkpatrick / Cindy Fonseca6-0, 6-0
2022-10-15vs ESB:StrausserLost 01
L#1 DoublesJeanne Blackmore / Maura Wygmans vs Margaret Limoge / Jennifer Weiss1-6, 3-6
2022-10-01vs ESB:BTC Gals:KirkpatrickWon 10
W#1 DoublesKim McManus / Lori Roberts vs Cindy Fonseca / Maureen Usifer6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ESB:Strausser9191564
2ESB:Richardson8282767
3ESB:BTC Gals:Kirkpatrick46461390
4EE:Morgan-Yatzor/Samter373716104
5OC:The Diehards:Yost/Foulk191919116

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Maura Wygmans
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Kim McManus
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Jeanne Blackmore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Chaska Richardson
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maura Wygmans + Jeanne Blackmore14858% games+6.8% vs expected
Chaska Richardson + Jeanne Blackmore134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maura Wygmans
34W–20L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
Kim McManus
40W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
Jeanne Blackmore
65W–61L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Chaska Richardson
23W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.