Teams

COTA/Dianne Bahnsen

2025 COTA USTA Adult 65 & Over Women - Spring · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.42 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-15vs JMCC/Hale-Oelke 65Split 11
W#1 DoublesCindy Lester / Anne McCollum vs Patricia Burke / Susan McKinney6-7, 6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesDarrah Henn / Dianne Bahnsen vs Donna Matthews / Pam Smith4-6, 4-6
2025-04-08vs JMCC/Hale-Oelke 65Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLinda Pickering / Nancy Flowers vs Donna Matthews / Donna Fiorenza2-6, 6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBetsey Chastain / Katherine Gail Hawkins vs Wanda Beard / Susan McKinney6-3, 4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDianne Bahnsen / Lyn Bennett vs Patricia Burke / Lorie Gochenour4-6, 6-4, 2-6
2025-04-01vs JMCC/Hale-Oelke 65Won 30
W#1 DoublesDonna Kyle / Cindy Lester vs Susan McKinney / Patricia Burke6-1, 4-6, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Pickering / Nancy Flowers vs Cathy Gruetter / Joan Baird7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLynn Baginski / Deborah Brown vs Sallie Hale / Patricia Kohle6-3, 6-2
2025-03-25vs JMCC/Hale-Oelke 65Won 21
W#1 DoublesPeggy Sullivan / Nancy Flowers vs Sallie Hale / Patricia Kohle6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesCindy Lester / Donna Kyle vs Cathy Gruetter / Pam Smith6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLyn Bennett / Deborah Brown vs Lisa Oelke / Lorie Gochenour6-3, 6-1
2025-03-18vs JMCC/Hale-Oelke 65Won 21
W#1 DoublesLynn Baginski / Wanda Neislar vs Cathy Gruetter / Sallie Hale6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesNancy Flowers / Linda Pickering vs Patricia Burke / Donna Matthews3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesDeborah Brown / Anne McCollum vs Patricia Kohle / Lisa Oelke6-1, 6-4
2025-03-11vs JMCC/Hale-Oelke 65Won 21
L#1 DoublesPeggy Sullivan / Nancy Flowers vs Patricia Burke / Susan McKinney5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKatherine Gail Hawkins / Lynn Baginski vs Patricia Kohle / Joan Baird6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDarrah Henn / Betsey Chastain vs Shelley Hulland / Lorie Gochenour6-1, 4-6, 7-6
2025-03-04vs JMCC/Hale-Oelke 65Won 21
W#1 DoublesWanda Neislar / Peggy Sullivan vs Patricia Burke / Susan McKinney5-7, 6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNancy Flowers / Katherine Gail Hawkins vs Patricia Kohle / Pam Smith6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesLyn Bennett / Darrah Henn vs Cathy Gruetter / Donna Matthews6-1, 5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.31
Wanda Neislar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Cindy Lester
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Brenda Lazarus
published 3.5
3.24
Darrah Henn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
Donna Kyle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.14
Katherine Gail Hawkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Peggy Sullivan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Dianne Bahnsen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.00
Lynn Baginski
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.90
Lyn Bennett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Betsey Chastain
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.87
Linda Pickering
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.83
Anne McCollum
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Peggy Sullivan + Wanda Neislar4158% gamesnot enough data
Darrah Henn + Dianne Bahnsen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wanda Neislar
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
Cindy Lester
9W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Brenda Lazarus
1W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Darrah Henn
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Donna Kyle
12W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Katherine Gail Hawkins
6W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
3.14
Peggy Sullivan
8W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Dianne Bahnsen
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
45%55%<1%
3.02
Lynn Baginski
7W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
Lyn Bennett
4W–7L career · 3 lines in 2025
76%24%<1%
2.90
3
Betsey Chastain
6W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
Linda Pickering
17W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3.5
Anne McCollum
13W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.