Teams

KY/LOU/GORDINIER/COURTENAY

2024 USTA FALL 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2024-12-14vs KY/LOU/MEAGHER/SCHARFLost 02
L#1 DoublesDeanna Gordinier / Whitney Jamie vs Meghan Frakes / Juliet Gray4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesErin Carter / Dawn Courtenay vs Peggy Hertel / Theresa Neichter1-6, 3-6
2024-12-08vs KY/LOU/BEAM-KIKLost 02
L#1 DoublesMary Korfhage / Jill Watson vs Annie Kuzmicky / Shannon Kessler0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Courtenay / Whitney Jamie vs Katie Porter / Lindsey Lare1-6, 4-6
2024-11-30vs KY/LOU/WHITESplit 11
W#1 DoublesDeanna Gordinier / JESSICA MOORE vs Lee Sexton / Shannon Elder6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesErin Carter / Amy Brennenstuhl vs Jackie Fralick / Cyndi Sullivan0-6, 1-6
2024-11-24vs KY/LOU/WEIDMANLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathleen Johnson / Dawn Courtenay vs Carrie Merrill / Jillian Brooks6-3, 0-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLibby Milligan vs Kathy Kostas1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Carter / Amy Brennenstuhl vs Kelley Roberts / Stephanie Virtue2-6, 0-6
2024-11-16vs KY/LOU/MAGARWon 21
W#1 DoublesLeslie Wood / JESSICA MOORE vs Katie Cropper / Lyndsay Magar7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDeanna Gordinier vs Caroline Mulcahy2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Torp / Kathleen Johnson vs Andrea Schnurr / Amanda Helfrich6-2, 6-2
2024-11-02vs KY/LOU/DALTONLost 03
L#1 DoublesErin Carter / Jill Watson vs Tina Cline / Kate Hendon3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDeanna Gordinier vs Lisa Steen0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Taylor / JESSICA MOORE vs Courtney Corrigan / Bettye Wright3-6, 2-6
2024-10-27vs KY/LOU/MEAGHER/SCHARFLost 12
W#1 DoublesDeanna Gordinier / Elizabeth Torp vs Meghan Frakes / Mary Beth Meagher6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesLibby Milligan vs Jessica Scheiner7-6, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAmy Taylor / Erin Carter vs Jenny England / Tracey Woock1-6, 0-6
2024-10-18vs KY/LOU/BEAM-KIKLost 02
L#1 DoublesDawn Courtenay / JESSICA MOORE vs Jen Root / MJ Kik1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Schmitt / Erin Carter vs Elizabeth Goodknight / Ellen Clements0-6, 1-6
2024-10-13vs KY/LOU/WHITELost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Torp / Kathleen Johnson vs Lori Caloia / Lee Sexton6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAmy Curry vs Karen Christopher1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAmy Taylor / Katie Schmitt vs Lilly Massa-McKinley / Amy Edelen2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KY/LOU/WHITE72151228224
2KY/LOU/MAGAR45141332264
3KY/LOU/MEAGHER/SCHARF35101430209
4KY/LOU/GORDINIER/COURTENAY1852245295

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Deanna Gordinier
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.84
Elizabeth Torp
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Amy Curry
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Emori Carrara
published 3
2.67
Whitney Jamie
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Amy Brennenstuhl
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.56
JESSICA MOORE
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Erin Carter
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.48
Dawn Courtenay
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.37
Libby Milligan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Katie Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Korfhage
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Whitney Watt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Brennenstuhl + Libby Milligan314 matchesnot enough data
JESSICA MOORE + Dawn Courtenay123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Brennenstuhl + Erin Carter123 matchesnot enough data
Whitney Jamie + Elizabeth Torp123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Deanna Gordinier
35W–64L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Elizabeth Torp
23W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
2.84
3
Amy Curry
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
3
Emori Carrara
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Whitney Jamie
11W–21L career · 2 lines in 2024
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Amy Brennenstuhl
9W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.59
3
JESSICA MOORE
11W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
Erin Carter
2W–10L career · type S · 6 lines in 2024
37%63%<1%
2.54
3
Dawn Courtenay
14W–31L career · 7 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
2.48
Libby Milligan
25W–26L career · 2 lines in 2024
85%15%<1%
2.37
Katie Schmitt
2W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Korfhage
2W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Whitney Watt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.