Teams

HIW YELLOW

2026 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-28vs RHCC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Courtney / Kathleen O'rourke vs Daytona Barker / Brittany Kinsey6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJacquelyn Clark vs Anju Visweswaraiah7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMary Noto / Susan Kim vs Emily Ballinger / Liby Zachariah6-0, 6-0
2026-07-21vs NJ YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJacquelyn Clark / Erin Coors vs Andra Gerlesits / Ashriel Lutz4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJj Scott / Susan Courtney vs Nicole Peiffer / Loraine Glidewell0-6, 0-6
2026-07-14vs MC PURPLEWon 20
W#1 DoublesMary Noto / Susan Kim vs Patti Howell / Jayne McGarry6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesErin Coors vs Kim Hagar4-6, 4-2
2026-07-07vs RHCC REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesSusan Courtney / Jacquelyn Clark vs Sarah Ortega / Kelley Barnard6-7, 0-6
W#1 SinglesKathleen O'rourke vs Erin Marcotte6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesJj Scott / Susan Kim vs Daytona Barker / Jessica Geesaman4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-06-30vs NJ YELLOWLost 12
L#1 DoublesErin Coors / Susan Courtney vs Andrea Grant / Nicole Peiffer0-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesJacquelyn Clark vs Sarah Poel7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Noto / Jj Scott vs Loraine Glidewell / Andra Gerlesits1-6, 1-6
2026-06-23vs MC PURPLELost 12
W#1 DoublesMary Noto / Jacquelyn Clark vs Patti Howell / Jayne McGarry6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesErin Coors vs Jillian Clark6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJj Scott / Kathleen O'rourke vs Kat Holm / Kim Hagar2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 2.5 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.19 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.40
Jacquelyn Clark
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 2.5
2.34
Mary Noto
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Kathleen O'rourke
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Erin Coors
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.11
Susan Courtney
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
1.86
Jj Scott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen O'rourke + Susan Courtney3254% games+7.3% vs expected
Jacquelyn Clark + Mary Noto4354% games+0.5% vs expected
Erin Coors + Mary Noto134 matchesnot enough data
Erin Coors + Jacquelyn Clark033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Jacquelyn Clark
14W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%76%24%
2.40
Mary Noto
16W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Kathleen O'rourke
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Erin Coors
7W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Susan Courtney
4W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Jj Scott
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.86

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.