Teams

Er.Wynia40S

2026 Capital Singles 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-12vs Em.Kendall40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesSonet Weber vs Emily Kendall6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Kristen Wassel6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Laura Panebianco6-4, 5-3
2026-07-05vs Em.Kendall40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesSonet Weber vs Kristen Wassel6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Dougherty vs Laura Panebianco6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAmy Hobbs vs Carolyn Roach6-4, 7-5
2026-06-28vs Em.Kendall40SWon 20
W#2 SinglesShannon Littleton vs Laura Panebianco6-2, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAmy Hobbs vs Ann Willard6-0, 6-4
2026-06-17vs Em.Kendall40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesSonet Weber vs Mary Jo Nugent6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesCarolina Robayo vs Emily Kendall6-3, 6-2
L#3 SinglesGillian Kelleher vs Ashley McCollum3-6, 4-6
2026-06-07vs Em.Kendall40SLost 12
L#1 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Mary Jo Nugent4-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesErin Wynia vs Shannon Beach3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 SinglesJulie Dougherty vs Ann Willard7-5, 6-0
2026-05-24vs Em.Kendall40SWon 21
W#1 SinglesSonet Weber vs Carolyn Roach6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesShannon Littleton vs Shannon Beach3-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 SinglesDeb Lanier vs Rachel Mills6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-05-17vs Em.Kendall40SWon 30
W#1 SinglesSonet Weber vs Ashley McCollum6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDianna Erwin vs Emily Kendall6-2, 6-3
W#3 SinglesAmy Hobbs vs Laura Panebianco7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Er.Wynia40S611749122
2Em.Kendall40S1641736240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Sonet Weber
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Singles 14% · published 3.5
3.58
Julie Dougherty
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published
3.56
Deb Lanier
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.54
Amy Hobbs
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Shannon Littleton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.45
Dianna Erwin
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.39
Erin Wynia
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Gillian Kelleher
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Carolina Robayo
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Erin Wynia + Amy Hobbs7061% games+4.7% vs expected
Shannon Littleton + Julie Dougherty12957% games+3.2% vs expected
Carolina Robayo + Gillian Kelleher2544% gamesnot enough data
Deb Lanier + Gillian Kelleher044 matchesnot enough data
Julie Dougherty + Erin Wynia224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sonet Weber
48W–3L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.83
Julie Dougherty
49W–19L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
3.5
Deb Lanier
488W–223L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%33%67%
3.56
3.5
Amy Hobbs
55W–19L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%38%62%
3.54
Shannon Littleton
38W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Dianna Erwin
224W–99L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Erin Wynia
185W–127L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Gillian Kelleher
166W–164L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Carolina Robayo
145W–190L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.