Teams

Hills/J. Orsini/40&Over4.0M

2023 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.07 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 DoublesTu Phan / Elvin Vargas vs Eugen Schwarz / Jose Alomar4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJaime Villegas / Elvin Vargas vs Daren McGovern / Erik Breitenbach7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-05-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesYarek Orsini / Elvin Vargas vs Rodney Crawford / Luis Graf1-6, 4-6
2023-05-07vs Saddlebrook - L. BarbettaWon 10
W#2 DoublesJaime Villegas / Elvin Vargas vs R Fotheringham / Raymond Haga6-4, 7-5
2023-04-29vs Palma Ceia - W. RobertsWon 10
W#2 DoublesAni Ganesan / Elvin Vargas vs John Neal / John Eckermann6-2, 6-1
2023-04-22Won 10
W#2 DoublesElvin Vargas / Robert Miller vs Eddie Collins / John Kushner6-4, 6-2
2023-04-15vs West Meadows - C.KarkourWon 10
W#3 DoublesYarek Orsini / Elvin Vargas vs Dan Crawford / Lawrence Popescu6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-04-08vs Riverhills - K. ThomkinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBrad Armagost / Elvin Vargas vs Jeffrey Benelli / Marvin Jones3-6, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Chris New
published 4.5
3.84
Gunnar Nelson
published 4
3.79
Carlos Layrisse
published 4
3.77
Michael Rossi
published
3.77
Albert Alhadeff
published 4
Brad Armagost
published 4
3.72
Richard Helme
published
3.71
Jaime Villegas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Elvin Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
3.62
Tu Phan
published
3.58
Yarek Orsini
published
3.43
Javier Espinoza
published
Robert Miller
published
Shane Broussard
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elvin Vargas + Jaime Villegas3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Chris New
13W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
4.32
4
Gunnar Nelson
6W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Carlos Layrisse
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.79
Michael Rossi
9W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Albert Alhadeff
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Brad Armagost
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Richard Helme
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.72
4
Jaime Villegas
129W–65L career · 2 lines in 2023
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Elvin Vargas
127W–111L career · 8 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
Tu Phan
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.62
Yarek Orsini
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
>99%<1%<1%
3.58
Javier Espinoza
4W–3L career · no lines in 2023
70%30%<1%
3.43
Robert Miller
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Shane Broussard
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.