Teams

World Tennis Center - Badiu

2021 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-05-25vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 12
L#1 DoublesJocelyn Badiu / Michele Nelson-Baker vs Lynne Huggins / Marzenna Nowak7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerry Dirr / Liana Franke vs Bernadette DiPino / Lori Irvin Hawes6-0, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Maureen Wells vs Gladyvette Benarroch / Ann Heinauer6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2021-05-18vs Quail West - A. PacanaLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Dirr / Liana Franke vs Lisa Kresse - (DQ)* / Karen Steuber5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Shae Rohling vs Sherry Newland / Cynthia Sabatino6-7, 5-7
2021-05-11vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 20
W#2 DoublesLisa Ruffolo / Terry Dirr vs Diana Pleeter / Teresa Madonia6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTracy Lockton / Gwendolyn Messonnier vs Sunny Barger / Brenda Rhoda4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-05-04vs COLLIER - Grey Oaks - LaveryLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Dirr / Maureen Wells vs Debra Logue / Anne Marie Russell4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJocelyn Badiu / Gwendolyn Messonnier vs Karyn Sardar / Nancy Harbert1-6, 1-6
2021-04-27vs Pelican Bay Park - K. DaveyLost 12
W#1 DoublesJocelyn Badiu / Michele Nelson-Baker vs Cristina Arango / Diana DeFulviis6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Diane Cahill vs Susan Burgess / Renee Biggam4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarole Flegel / Maureen Wells vs Kimberly Davey / Lisa Gosney6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2021-04-20vs Naples Reserve - ShelgrenLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichele Nelson-Baker / Shae Rohling vs Sindi Sanzica / Bernadette DiPino5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMaureen Wells / Diane Cahill vs Marianne Khayat / Ann Heinauer0-6, 2-6
2021-04-13vs Quail West - A. PacanaWon 21
W#1 DoublesTerry Dirr / Carole Flegel vs Vesna Petrovic / Ann Biever2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Maureen Wells vs Tasha Christiansen / Lisa Kresse - (DQ)*2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTracy Lockton / Michele Nelson-Baker vs Amista Morgan / Laurie Puddester7-6, 6-4
2021-04-06vs Pelican Marsh - BargerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMichele Nelson-Baker / Terry Dirr vs Julie Mans / Kristine Laterra3-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesGwendolyn Messonnier / Shae Rohling vs Sunny Barger / Debra Bowenkamp6-0, 6-3
2021-03-30vs COLLIER - Grey Oaks - LaverySplit 11
L#1 SinglesGwendolyn Messonnier vs MacKenzie Rickman1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesTerry Dirr / Carole Flegel vs Peggy Hogan / Anne Marie Russell2-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-03-23vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkWon 21
W#1 DoublesMary Miranda-Del Rossi / Michele Nelson-Baker vs Cristina Arango / Wendy Garber6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesGwendolyn Messonnier vs Judy Beckler2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Dirr / Lisa Ruffolo vs Kimberly Davey / Catherine Rigamer6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Adult 40 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.28
3.92
Terry Dirr
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 4
Carole Flegel
published 4
3.73
Michele Nelson-Baker
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.71
Shae Rohling
published
3.69
Tracy Lockton
published
3.68
Jocelyn Badiu
published
3.59
Gwendolyn Messonnier
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.48
Diane Cahill
published 4
Liana Franke
published
Lisa Ruffolo
published
Maureen Wells
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Nelson-Baker + Terry Dirr141253% games+3.4% vs expected
Michele Nelson-Baker + Gwendolyn Messonnier61146% gamesnot enough data
Michele Nelson-Baker + Maureen Wells5550% gamesnot enough data
Terry Dirr + Gwendolyn Messonnier213 matchesnot enough data
Terry Dirr + Jocelyn Badiu213 matchesnot enough data
Maureen Wells + Gwendolyn Messonnier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Miranda-Del Rossi
14W–11L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%4%
4.28
4
Terry Dirr
323W–169L career · 8 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Carole Flegel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Nelson-Baker
94W–98L career · 6 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Shae Rohling
35W–33L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
Tracy Lockton
99W–49L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.69
Jocelyn Badiu
9W–4L career · no lines in 2021
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Gwendolyn Messonnier
133W–140L career · 9 lines in 2021
25%75%<1%
3.59
4
Diane Cahill
2W–8L career · no lines in 2021
55%45%<1%
3.48
Liana Franke
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Ruffolo
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Maureen Wells
56W–49L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.