Teams

YMCA Mace

2025 OH OV WINTER · SPRING A18&O

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs Brian McCutcheon4-6, 3-6
2025-04-27vs CTC NassifWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs Shawn Bastin6-4, 7-5
2025-04-12Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs Jay Cooke7-6, 5-7, 0-1
2025-04-06Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs Brian McCutcheon2-6, 2-6
2025-03-22vs TIC SuttonLost 01
L#2 SinglesMichael Kawash vs Brandon Gwinn3-6, 3-6
2025-03-16vs CTC NassifLost 01
L#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs David Sadd7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-01Won 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs Brian McCutcheon7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-02-16vs CTC NassifWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs David Hanna6-0, 6-2
2025-01-26Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMichael Kawash vs Joshua Lawson3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SPRING A18&O have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Michael Kawash
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #2 Singles 11% · published
3.30
Otmer Elmore
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published
3.27
Richard Pickens
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
H Jason Hall
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.18
Michael Edens
usually #2 Singles 44%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.08
Jeffery MacE
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Kevin Ellison
usually #2 Singles 29%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Mark Jacobs
published
Ramanath Haricharan
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
Summer Cook
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Summer Cook + Jeffery MacE4937% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Ellison + H Jason Hall5850% gamesnot enough data
Richard Pickens + Michael Edens4250% gamesnot enough data
Richard Pickens + Jeffery MacE2441% gamesnot enough data
Michael Edens + Jeffery MacE6075% gamesnot enough data
Ramanath Haricharan + Jeffery MacE303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Kawash
25W–24L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Otmer Elmore
22W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.30
Richard Pickens
39W–56L career · 9 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
H Jason Hall
6W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.25
Michael Edens
52W–38L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.18
Jeffery MacE
77W–68L career · 8 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Kevin Ellison
10W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mark Jacobs
33W–34L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Ramanath Haricharan
26W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
Summer Cook
9W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.