Teams

TCRC Parks

2025 Richmond Combo Weekend · Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.70 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-09-14vs Miracles - MarksLost 12
W#1 DoublesAndy Tucker / Ravi Ravichandran vs Ross Overstreet / John Kim6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesWilliam Cosby / William Wise vs Gianni R Snidle / Christopher Kochensparger1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDon Ha / AJ James vs Tracy Marks / Christopher Quirk7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-06vs WW Thunderstruck - MullahyWon 10
W#3 DoublesSung Kang / Darioush Ramazani vs Jacob Dyer / Robert Nilson6-2, 6-4
2025-08-23vs ACAC CarterWon 10
W#3 DoublesSung Kang / Darioush Ramazani vs Anant Singh / Ryan Traylor3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-08-03vs Prestige Worldwide - DanielLost 12
W#1 DoublesRavi Ravichandran / Andy Tucker vs Jason Fenchuk / Casey Hill7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesTim Parks / Bo Bowden vs Jory Brinkerhoff / Jon Czyszczon1-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesWilliam Wise / William Cosby vs Joe Lacroix / Eric Miller4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Combo Weekend 7.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.38 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Sung Kang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
Andy Tucker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Tim Parks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.60
William Cosby
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.34
Robert Preservati
published
3.32
Ravi Ravichandran
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
AJ James
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
William Wise
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.10
Don Ha
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
3.05
Bo Bowden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Parks + William Cosby213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Sung Kang
202W–85L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%90%1%
4.19
4
Andy Tucker
5W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tim Parks
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
William Cosby
11W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.60
Robert Preservati
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%13%
3.34
Ravi Ravichandran
13W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
AJ James
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
William Wise
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Don Ha
15W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Darioush Ramazani
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3.5
Bo Bowden
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.