Teams

OK/Stan Swyden/55&over9.0M

2024 OKCAdult 55 & Over League · 9.0

14 players · average NTRP 4.25 / OKLAHOMA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-05-20vs Stokes/ChoiWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcelo Puiggari / Stan Swyden vs Kelly Bratcher / Jeff Cato7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMatthew Kutch / Richard Alexander vs Coleman Clark / Craig Milkowski7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesH Treak Tasker / Tim Ritchie vs Ben Mccarley / Terry Stokes6-1, 6-1
2024-05-05vs Stokes/ChoiWon 30
W#1 DoublesWilliam Mee / Kevin Hill vs Kelly Bratcher / Coleman Clark6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesLee Crowley / H Treak Tasker vs Mark Hoesel / James Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTed Moore / Matthew Kutch vs Terry Stokes / Billy Little6-4, 6-3
2024-04-28vs Stokes/ChoiWon 30
W#1 DoublesH Treak Tasker / Lane Wilson vs Mark Hoesel / Coleman Clark7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBob Berlien / James Billingsley vs James Anderson / Craig Milkowski7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTed Moore / William Mee vs Billy Little / Jeff Cato6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2024-04-21vs Stokes/ChoiWon 21
L#1 DoublesLane Wilson / Richard Alexander vs Kelly Bratcher / Coleman Clark2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNeale Pashley / Tim Ritchie vs John Brett / James Anderson6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLee Crowley / Kevin Hill vs William Choi / Jeff Cato6-4, 7-6
2024-04-21vs Stokes/ChoiWon 21
W#1 DoublesNeale Pashley / Lane Wilson vs Kelly Bratcher / Coleman Clark6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTim Ritchie / Stan Swyden vs Ben Mccarley / Kent Coleman6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesLee Crowley / Richard Alexander vs Terry Stokes / Mark Hoesel0-1
2024-04-14vs Stokes/ChoiWon 30
W#1 DoublesMarcelo Puiggari / Kevin Hill vs Kelly Bratcher / Billy Little6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMatthew Kutch / William Mee vs Mark Hoesel / Kent Coleman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesBob Berlien / James Billingsley vs Terry Stokes / William Choi6-0, 6-4
2024-04-07vs Stokes/ChoiWon 21
W#1 DoublesNeale Pashley / Marcelo Puiggari vs Kelly Bratcher / Jeff Cato6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesStan Swyden / James Billingsley vs Craig Milkowski / Mark Hoesel7-6, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBob Berlien / Ted Moore vs Terry Stokes / James Anderson6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1OK/Stan Swyden/55&over9.0M7018310157
2Stokes/Choi0731838240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.44
Bob Berlien
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
James Billingsley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Matthew Kutch
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.11
Neale Pashley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.92
H Treak Tasker
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Bill Towler
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.29
Lee Crowley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Kevin Hill
published
Lane Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marcelo Puiggari
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Stan Swyden
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ted Moore
published
Tim Ritchie
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
William Mee
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

James Billingsley + Bob Berlien11168% games−1.8% vs expected
H Treak Tasker + Neale Pashley7255% games−2.9% vs expected
Marcelo Puiggari + Matthew Kutch5066% gamesnot enough data
James Billingsley + Marcelo Puiggari213 matchesnot enough data
James Billingsley + William Mee213 matchesnot enough data
Stan Swyden + Neale Pashley303 matchesnot enough data
William Mee + Matthew Kutch303 matchesnot enough data
Matthew Kutch + Bob Berlien303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Bob Berlien
76W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
4.44
James Billingsley
58W–31L career · 4 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
4.16
Matthew Kutch
65W–22L career · 5 lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
4.11
Neale Pashley
42W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
H Treak Tasker
33W–32L career · 3 lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Bill Towler
39W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lee Crowley
73W–47L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%2%98%
3.29
Kevin Hill
5W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lane Wilson
17W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marcelo Puiggari
58W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Stan Swyden
36W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ted Moore
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Ritchie
12W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
William Mee
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.