Teams

Escambia/Wilson/18&Over6.0MXD

2024 Escambia Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_1

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-13vs Esmonde - PCCWon 20
W#2 DoublesSkylar Wilson / Jerry Clark vs Allee Blay-Digby / Matthew Myer6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJill Sparks / George Rials vs Dax Campbell / Lori Chunn6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2024-07-30vs Quinn - SHLWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanice Clark / Jerry Clark vs Jessica Isakson / Vernon Hairston6-0, 6-0
2024-07-23vs McElhany - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Rials / Jill Sparks vs Jennifer Washington / Brody Mcelhany7-6, 6-1
2024-07-16vs Harvey - PCCWon 10
W#3 DoublesJanice Clark / Jerry Clark vs Evan Covington / Amanda Davies6-2, 6-1
2024-07-09vs Dong - RS ClayWon 10
W#3 DoublesSavannah Wilson / Jerry Clark vs Thuy Nguyen / Auston Fillinger6-1, 5-7, 1-0
2024-07-02vs Ross - RS HardWon 10
W#3 DoublesGeorge Rials / Leigh Diamond vs Rick Greene / Monika Greene6-0, 6-1
2024-06-25vs DellaFera - RS HardLost 01
L#2 DoublesJill Sparks / George Rials vs Tucker Massey / Oliva Smith7-6, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Nick Farkas
published
3.50
George Rials
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Creagh Ekelund
published 3.5
3.19
Jerry Clark
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.93
Ethan Rhone
published
2.92
Ryan Sellars
published
2.87
Thomas Schellin
published
2.78
Leigh Diamond
published
2.75
Jill Sparks
published
2.72
Kacee Bidnick
published
2.57
Susan Schellin
published
Janice Clark
published
Savannah Wilson
published
Tim Ekelund
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Farkas
47W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%42%58%
3.53
3.5
George Rials
95W–44L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Creagh Ekelund
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Jerry Clark
145W–79L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.19
Ethan Rhone
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Ryan Sellars
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%72%28%
2.92
Thomas Schellin
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Leigh Diamond
3W–4L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Jill Sparks
15W–9L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
Kacee Bidnick
11W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Susan Schellin
14W–10L career · no lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
2.57
Janice Clark
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Savannah Wilson
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tim Ekelund
1W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.