Teams

Marco Y - D.Keely

2024 Collier Mixed 55 & Over Winter · Mixed 55 & Over 7.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-03-03vs Cambier - SmileyWon 10
W#1 DoublesEd Coringrato / Tina Jaquess vs David Groom / Josee Theriault6-1, 6-2
2024-02-10vs Isles Of Collier - C. YoungWon 10
W#3 DoublesEd Coringrato / Tina Jaquess vs Jeffrey Hendrey / Carol Garrison6-1, 6-0
2024-01-20vs COLLIER/Gauch55&over7.0MXDLost 01
L#1 DoublesMark Bunecky / Tina Jaquess vs Babs Leddy / Ivan Korbar7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Mixed 55 & Over 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Ray
published 4
3.64
Inge Lund
published 4
3.51
Joseph Kardek
published
3.51
David Keely
published 3.5
3.36
Ed Coringrato
published 3.5
3.25
Tina Jaquess
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.18
Linda Keely
published
3.11
Victoria Pollock
published
3.02
Odette Kardek
published
2.64
Marybeth Ray
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Keely + David Keely2348% gamesnot enough data
Inge Lund + Ed Coringrato033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Ray
0W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Inge Lund
17W–15L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Joseph Kardek
11W–39L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
David Keely
32W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
Ed Coringrato
20W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%85%15%
3.36
Tina Jaquess
105W–80L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
Linda Keely
11W–22L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.18
Victoria Pollock
10W–13L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.11
Odette Kardek
13W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%45%55%
3.02
Marybeth Ray
5W–31L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
2.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.