Teams

ACAC Lewis / Pfeiffer 6.5

2026 Richmond Combo Mixed · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings26 teams · Richmond Combo Mixed 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Westwood West000000
2Dominion Dykes Mixed 6.5000000
3MAC Church Mixed 6.5000000
4WW Pokeyberg - Combs-Pokrywka000000
5Avalon Luchsinger Mixed Misfits000000
6Raintree Retrievers - Cheek000000
7ACAC Ralstown Combo Mixed - Townsend000000
8Raintree Begin000000
9Woodlake Phelps 6.5000000
10ACAC Lewis / Pfeiffer 6.5000000
11Avalon Ghita 6.5 Combo Mix000000
12ACAC Naputi - Berg 6.5 CM000000
13Dominion Club Long000000
14Burkwood Sweeney 6.5000000
15ACAC Mixed up Jonesie 6.5000000
16MAC Mavericks Bates000000
17Belmont sherdel styer000000
18SCC McClenny 6.5 Combo Mixed000000
19MAC Talamo 6.5000000
20CCV 6.5000000
21MAG Green 6.5000000
22Bon Air 6.5000000
23KRA Ball Smashers000000
24MRTC Hawley 6.5000000
25Willow Oaks McFadden000000
26Willow Oaks Gregory000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Martinique Kandl
published 3.5
3.25
Kristen Hornbeck
published
3.24
Thomas Wilson
published
3.13
Kari Bivins
published
3.13
Alexander Smith
published 3.5
3.11
Carol Pfeiffer
published 3.5
3.10
Natalie Lewis
published 3.5
3.06
Kelley Kent
published
2.89
Ashley Curtis
published 3
2.80
Peter Olson
published
2.78
Robert Thoms
published
2.75
Greg Jabs
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thomas Wilson + Carol Pfeiffer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Martinique Kandl
167W–65L career · no lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.46
Kristen Hornbeck
19W–4L career · no lines in 2026
2%95%3%
3.25
Thomas Wilson
24W–19L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.24
Kari Bivins
44W–19L career · no lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.13
3.5
Alexander Smith
18W–36L career · type A · no lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Carol Pfeiffer
9W–16L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.11
3.5
Natalie Lewis
142W–128L career · no lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
Kelley Kent
57W–27L career · no lines in 2026
<1%34%66%
3.06
3
Ashley Curtis
47W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
Peter Olson
24W–25L career · no lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Robert Thoms
16W–18L career · no lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Greg Jabs
12W–6L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.