Teams

Sa.Overholser18S

2025 Capital Singles 18 & Over · 3.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-07-22Lost 02
L#1 SinglesKristin Esham vs Elizabeth Durland1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesTyler Cunningham vs Laura Brown3-6, 3-6
2025-07-17Won 10
W#3 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Tara Fadenrecht6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2025-07-15vs Sh.Leaver18SLost 01
L#3 SinglesTyler Cunningham vs Mary Jo Nugent0-6, 2-6
2025-07-14vs Ka.Barsness18SSplit 11
W#2 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Ashley Walker6-4, 6-3
L#3 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Kari Barsness4-6, 6-7
2025-07-08vs Sh.Littleton18SLost 03
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Kimberly McLellan5-7, 0-6
L#2 SinglesTyler Cunningham vs Hannah Boghosian0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesKristin Esham vs Vanese Clough4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-10Lost 01
L#1 SinglesSarah Overholser vs Amanda Mueller2-6, 4-6
2025-06-03vs Er.Wynia18SLost 01
L#2 SinglesCatie Cunningham vs Anna Kooper2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.29
Holly Camak
published
3.18
Bethany Perkins
published 3.5
3.09
Sarah Overholser
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Tyler Cunningham
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
3.04
Catie Cunningham
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3.5
2.99
Kristin Esham
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 25% · published 3
2.82
Lillian Todd
published
2.67
Charlotte Kopp
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Esham + Catie Cunningham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Camak
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Bethany Perkins
8W–17L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Sarah Overholser
123W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
3.09
3
Tyler Cunningham
45W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3.5
Catie Cunningham
98W–63L career · type A · 7 lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
3
Kristin Esham
89W–69L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
Lillian Todd
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Charlotte Kopp
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
12%88%1%
2.67

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.