Teams

LK

Adult 18 & Over Early Start · 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.75 / SOUTHERN ARIZONA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-11-08vs InternationalsLost 12
L#1 DoublesDavid Clausen / Michael Pinkard vs Karthik Chandrasekaran / Marek Dubovec6-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMarc Avalos vs Cody Petford1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRolando Mascareno / Naren Shanmugavelu vs Brian Ravesloot / Yao-Jan Wu6-4, 6-1
2025-11-02vs InternationalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesMarc Avalos / Rolando Mascareno vs Marek Dubovec / Cody Petford6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesLuke Kauffman vs David Fink4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNicholas Feltes / Derek Kropp vs Brian Ravesloot / Kyle Seyler6-7, 3-6
2025-10-10vs InternationalsLost 03
L#1 DoublesMarc Avalos / Michael Pinkard vs Cody Petford / Bogdan Racolta1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLuke Kauffman vs David Fink1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesNicholas Feltes / Derek Kropp vs Kyle Seyler / Yao-Jan Wu6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2025-09-21vs InternationalsLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Clausen / Michael Pinkard vs Brian Ravesloot / Cody Petford6-4, 5-7, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDerek Kropp vs David Fink3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesNicholas Feltes / Naren Shanmugavelu vs Yao-Jan Wu / Kyle Seyler5-7, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 5.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Internationals409310102
2LK043919129

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.50 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.02
Rolando Mascareno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.80
David Clausen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.74
Michael Pinkard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.34
Naren Shanmugavelu
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Derek Kropp
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.29
Luke Kauffman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.25
Marc Avalos
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.19
Nicholas Feltes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 11% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Naren Shanmugavelu + Marc Avalos213 matchesnot enough data
Michael Pinkard + David Clausen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rolando Mascareno
12W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
5.02
5
David Clausen
7W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
4.80
Michael Pinkard
15W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.74
Naren Shanmugavelu
24W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
88%12%<1%
4.34
4.5
Derek Kropp
7W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
4.32
Luke Kauffman
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
4.29
Marc Avalos
30W–26L career · 3 lines in 2026
97%3%<1%
4.25
Nicholas Feltes
51W–28L career · 9 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
4.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.