Teams

SGV Ball Hogs-Yip-Arroyo/SA4

2025 Tri-Level League - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Women 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.19 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#3 DoublesMaree Lingao / CARA Yokomizo vs Patricia Francisco / Andrea Tieng6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesCamille Farnsworth / Sachiko Kawai vs Wendy Crump / Stefani Galvagni0-6, 2-6
2025-07-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEileen Yip / CARA Yokomizo vs Rebecca Berman / Sandra Zane2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesSachiko Kawai / Linh Preston vs Lourdes Duarte / Karen Willaman6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.11 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
Ming-Ming Peng
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Skylar Sabetta
published
3.61
Yolanda Barocio
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.54
Umaa Rebbapragada
published
3.48
Esther Hwang
published
3.46
Ellie Wei
published
3.33
Jenny Lin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
Stacey Zhao
published
3.01
Sachiko Kawai
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.00
Maree Lingao
published
2.91
Linh Preston
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Eileen Yip
published
2.70
2.70
CARA Yokomizo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.55
Penny Penniston
published
2.44
Cathy Shin
published 3
2.19
Chris Konya
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linh Preston + Sachiko Kawai18760% games+7.8% vs expected
Ming-Ming Peng + Jenny Lin51043% games−2.3% vs expected
CARA Yokomizo + Sachiko Kawai224 matchesnot enough data
Ming-Ming Peng + Yolanda Barocio033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Ming-Ming Peng
52W–34L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
Skylar Sabetta
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Yolanda Barocio
136W–211L career · 7 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.61
Umaa Rebbapragada
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.54
Esther Hwang
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.48
Ellie Wei
4W–12L career · no lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.46
Jenny Lin
14W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.33
Stacey Zhao
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.32
3
Sachiko Kawai
27W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Maree Lingao
13W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.00
3
Linh Preston
20W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Eileen Yip
6W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
3
Camille Farnsworth
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
3
CARA Yokomizo
23W–61L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Penny Penniston
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
2.55
3
Cathy Shin
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44
2.5
Chris Konya
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.