Teams

Harkins/LR/Reb

2025 Mixed 18 & Over 3.0, 4.0, 10.0 · 3.0 Mixed

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-07-17vs Robinson/Benton/RebLost 02
L#1 DoublesTaylor Ransdell / Steven Ransdell vs Elizabeth Cook / Michael Brooks5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChris Holleman / Caroline Thomas vs Leslie Warford / Andrew Kincaid4-6, 2-6
2025-07-15vs Clark/LR/RebLost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Harkins / James Harkins vs Donald Deaton / Kaitlyn Witherell3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesSteven Ransdell / Taylor Ransdell vs Christa Clark / Max Good0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesChris Holleman / Caroline Thomas vs Sarah Rech / Don Dobbins1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-07-01vs Webster/Conway/BPLost 03
L#1 DoublesCaroline Thomas / Taylor Adams vs Bethany Downs / Charlie Roberts2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJames Harkins / Amy Harkins vs Kevin Martin / Yerenia Adame Hernandez2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCrystal Pennington / Chris Holleman vs Zachary Webster / Amy Webster3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2025-06-26vs Smouni/LR/PVCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesLindsey Wittenberg / Justin Wittenberg vs Abby Adkins / Brady Adkins6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSteven Ransdell / Taylor Ransdell vs Devon Kalkbrenner / William Kalkbrenner3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCrystal Pennington / Chris Holleman vs Rayni Bozynski / Andrew Adkins3-6, 0-6
2025-06-24vs Titus/LR/RebLost 12
W#1 DoublesLindsey Wittenberg / Justin Wittenberg vs Maggie Emerson / Bennett Perkins6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJames Harkins / Amy Harkins vs Lanie Driver / Blake Titus5-7, 2-4
L#3 DoublesChristopher Baehr / Erin Cosse vs Brandon Perkins / Raegan Hickam1-6, 1-6
2025-06-18vs Griffin/LR/RebSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAmy Harkins / James Harkins vs Jess Griffin / Yan Sun1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJustin Wittenberg / Lindsey Wittenberg vs Thomas Dobry / Rachel Stevens6-2, 6-3
2025-06-10vs Rutledge/Allison/LR/RebWon 21
L#1 DoublesAmy Harkins / James Harkins vs Justin Brown / Sara Bryant6-7
W#2 DoublesLindsey Wittenberg / Justin Wittenberg vs Katie Rutledge / Harsha Dondamury6-4, 4-5
W#3 DoublesErin Cosse / Taylor Adams vs Tod Cochran / Wendie Weare6-2, 5-0
2025-06-02vs Shaddock/LR/RebLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Harkins / James Harkins vs Regina Maher / Bud Watts2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Thomas / Rocklin Senavinin vs Anna Morshedi / Dustin Thompson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindsey Wittenberg / Chris Holleman vs Jennifer Corbin / Joshua Gaines3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Crystal Pennington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.10
Caroline Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.83
Erin Cosse
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Lindsey Wittenberg
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.69
Chris Holleman
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.64
Justin Wittenberg
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.63
Taylor Adams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.50
Elizabeth Chandler
published
2.43
Amy Harkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.38
Taylor Ransdell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Christopher Baehr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
James Harkins
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Rocklin Senavinin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Steven Ransdell
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsey Wittenberg + Justin Wittenberg10752% games+1.1% vs expected
Amy Harkins + James Harkins2937% gamesnot enough data
Taylor Ransdell + Steven Ransdell2444% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Crystal Pennington
11W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%10%90%
3.18
3
Caroline Thomas
21W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.10
Erin Cosse
18W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Lindsey Wittenberg
26W–34L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
3
Chris Holleman
14W–16L career · type S · 5 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Justin Wittenberg
16W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
2.64
Taylor Adams
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.63
Elizabeth Chandler
8W–19L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
2.50
3
Amy Harkins
3W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.43
Taylor Ransdell
4W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
79%21%<1%
2.38
Christopher Baehr
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
James Harkins
2W–12L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Rocklin Senavinin
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Steven Ransdell
3W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.