Teams

Lucky in Love 40+ 2.5

2023 Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2023-07-27vs Morris 40+ 2.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Tannan Hagyard vs Betsy Morris / Stephanie Jones6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Seema Iyer6-3, 6-1
2023-07-18vs Morris 40+ 2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesSophia Crawley / Miyeon Jeon vs Ellen Buckley / Courtney Robertson7-5, 6-2
2023-07-13vs Morris 40+ 2.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesTannan Hagyard / Dawn Macey-Boyette vs Marlo Newton / Seema Iyer0-6, 3-6
2023-07-09vs Morris 40+ 2.5Split 11
W#1 DoublesCarole Veihmeyer / Roshni Fifadra vs Ellen Buckley / Courtney Robertson6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKimberlee Schulden / Miyeon Jeon vs Betsy Morris / Andrea Smolen2-6, 5-7
2023-06-20vs Morris 40+ 2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesGrace Tran / Miyeon Jeon vs Linda Harrell / Andrea Smolen0-6, 1-6
2023-06-11vs Morris 40+ 2.5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMiyeon Jeon vs Linda Harrell6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2023-06-03Won 10
W#2 DoublesTannan Hagyard / Roshni Fifadra vs Marlo Newton / Stephanie Jones7-5, 6-1
2023-05-18vs Morris 40+ 2.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesRoshni Fifadra / Tannan Hagyard vs Courtney Robertson / Andrea Smolen6-1, 6-2
2023-05-08vs Morris 40+ 2.5Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKimberlee Schulden / Roshni Fifadra vs Andrea Smolen / Stephanie Baker3-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDawn Macey-Boyette / Tannan Hagyard vs Seema Iyer / Ellen Buckley2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Roshni Fifadra
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.95
Miyeon Jeon
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.84
Grace Tran
published
2.41
Kay Kalber
published
2.32
Tannan Hagyard
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 2.5
2.06
Kimberlee Schulden
published
Sophia Crawley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tannan Hagyard + Roshni Fifadra303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Roshni Fifadra
129W–127L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3
Miyeon Jeon
142W–88L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
2.95
Grace Tran
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.84
Kay Kalber
5W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%74%26%
2.41
2.5
Tannan Hagyard
35W–85L career · 11 lines in 2023
0%90%10%
2.32
Kimberlee Schulden
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Sophia Crawley
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.