Teams

CARB

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - ASPEN · MOUNTAINS

7 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-04vs GSCCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPeter Jacobson / Aarjave Shah vs Jason Wilson / Phillip Montez7-5, 7-6
W#1 SinglesKen Wanko vs Derek Wheatley7-5, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDouglas Hayes / Derek Skalko vs Derron Cloud / DAVID STRAHM3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2022-09-28vs GSCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesDerek Skalko / Peter Jacobson vs Derron Cloud / Tomas Franceschi6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKen Wanko / Mike Cassetty vs Jason Wilson / Phillip Montez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-20vs GSCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesDouglas Hayes / Peter Jacobson vs Tomas Franceschi / DAVID STRAHM4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAarjave Shah vs Jon Zalinski1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Johnson / Ken Wanko vs Derron Cloud / Phillip Montez6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2022-09-13vs GSCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesAarjave Shah / David Johnson vs Tomas Franceschi / Greg Hooker3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDerek Skalko vs Derek Wheatley6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDouglas Hayes / Peter Jacobson vs Jason Wilson / DAVID STRAHM6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-09-07vs GSCCWon 21
L#1 DoublesMike Cassetty / David Johnson vs Derron Cloud / DAVID STRAHM4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKen Wanko vs Derek Wheatley4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDerek Skalko / Aarjave Shah vs Phillip Montez / Jason Wilson6-2, 6-1
2022-08-30vs GSCCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMike Cassetty / Douglas Hayes vs Greg Hooker / Phillip Montez3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKen Wanko / Peter Jacobson vs Jason Wilson / DAVID STRAHM6-4, 6-2
2022-08-23vs GSCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKen Wanko / Derek Skalko vs Derron Cloud / Phillip Montez7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAarjave Shah / Mike Cassetty vs Greg Hooker / DAVID STRAHM3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MOUNTAINS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.63 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Douglas Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Shelley Lundh
published 4
3.55
Ken Wanko
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Aarjave Shah
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Derek Skalko
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Mike Cassetty
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Peter Jacobson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Douglas Hayes
22W–9L career · type M · 4 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Shelley Lundh
75W–121L career · no lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
3.56
Ken Wanko
22W–12L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%35%65%
3.55
3.5
Aarjave Shah
22W–10L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Derek Skalko
5W–4L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Cassetty
18W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Peter Jacobson
22W–23L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.