Teams

Ja.Terrell55C

2026 Capital Combo 55 & Over · 7.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.81 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-31vs Di.Sauer55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesSarah Breazeale / Catherine Brawner vs Amy Merdes / Meike Schacht6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesHelen Harris / Andra Kinlaw vs Tobi Buckley / Diane Sauer6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPaula Hale / Rebecca Sears vs Virgina Wilson / Kristine Potter6-3, 6-2
2026-08-24vs Su.Knowles55CWon 30
W#1 DoublesSherrie Lefere / Noelle Jackson vs Cindy Faltisco / Mary Margaret Patton6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesSuzanne Brown / Rebecca Procter vs Leigh Magee / Fran Ange3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElisebeth Gelardi / Kim McDonald vs Carol Muth / Susanne Knowles6-4, 7-6
2026-08-10vs Sh.Ingle55CLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Breazeale / Kim McDonald vs Sherry Ingle / Jennifer Bricker4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndra Kinlaw / Helen Harris vs Marie Del Vecchio / Nancy Gugliotta4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesStacey Jacobs / Rebecca Procter vs Leslie Corn / Francie Rourke5-7, 6-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.51 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
3.77
Noelle Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.69
Andra Kinlaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.68
Lisa Talton
published 4
3.60
Catherine Brawner
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.50
Rebecca Sears
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Rebecca Procter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
Sarah Breazeale
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Elisebeth Gelardi
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Helen Harris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
Sherrie Lefere
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Stacey Jacobs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Paula Hale
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Helen Harris + Sarah Breazeale6167% games+15.0% vs expected
Lisa Talton + Rebecca Procter11853% games−4.6% vs expected
Catherine Brawner + Lisa Talton4553% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Breazeale + Rebecca Procter4353% gamesnot enough data
Andra Kinlaw + Kana Brinckerhoff5154% gamesnot enough data
Catherine Brawner + Elisebeth Gelardi134 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Talton + Sarah Breazeale224 matchesnot enough data
Catherine Brawner + Sarah Breazeale213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kana Brinckerhoff
238W–110L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.93
Noelle Jackson
16W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Andra Kinlaw
119W–63L career · 2 lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.69
4
Lisa Talton
120W–112L career · no lines in 2026
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Catherine Brawner
112W–94L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.60
Rebecca Sears
7W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Rebecca Procter
185W–147L career · 2 lines in 2026
56%44%<1%
3.48
3.5
Sarah Breazeale
112W–87L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Elisebeth Gelardi
97W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Helen Harris
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
3.33
Sherrie Lefere
3W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
91%9%<1%
3.32
Stacey Jacobs
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2026
2%94%5%
3.28
Paula Hale
5W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.