Teams

BC-Peninsula/PattiYork

2025 ADULT 40 & OVER - Beach Cities · BC Women - 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.30 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-23vs BC-PalosVerdesTC/TriciaRapaportLost 12
L#1 DoublesRu Bai / Alison Cho vs Danielle Raymond / Jennifer Perkel5-7, 1-6
W#1 SinglesPrama Bhatt vs Janet Young6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAdeline Hui-Bon-Hoa / Maki Jerden vs Sherrie Brady / Michelle Wun1-6, 2-6
2025-02-02vs BC-LLW-SouthEnd/KathyKimLost 12
W#1 DoublesAlison Cho / Stacey Derr vs Joyce Choi / Kimberly Jones6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAdeline Hui-Bon-Hoa vs Christine Reeds0-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Ann Foard / Maki Jerden vs Jane Song-Gee / Yoshiun Wong1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for BC Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Alison Cho
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Ru Bai
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
TINA ZIMMER
published
3.33
Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.26
Maki Jerden
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Prama Bhatt
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.23
Ailin Li-Silverman
published 3.5
3.22
Stacey Derr
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.08
Sonomi Deguchi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.07
Maureen Takahashi
published
2.97
2.96
Mary Ann Foard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Philicia Endelman
published
Analisa Coria
published 3
Dolly Pham
published 3
Laureen Vivian
published
Miki Ishibashi
published
Sara Butler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Prama Bhatt + Maki Jerden2342% gamesnot enough data
Stacey Derr + Alison Cho4157% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Alison Cho
14W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.50
Ru Bai
11W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
TINA ZIMMER
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
3.5
Adeline Hui-Bon-Hoa
20W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
3.33
Maki Jerden
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Prama Bhatt
8W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%2%
3.24
3.5
Ailin Li-Silverman
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Stacey Derr
17W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.22
Sonomi Deguchi
2W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
28%72%<1%
3.08
Maureen Takahashi
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.07
Patricia Guerra York
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Mary Ann Foard
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.96
Philicia Endelman
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
3
Analisa Coria
2W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Dolly Pham
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Laureen Vivian
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Miki Ishibashi
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sara Butler
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.