Teams

Cathers/Piedmont 3.0W Fall Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Fall Singles · 3.0 Women Fall Singles

9 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-19vs Ray 3.0W Fall Singles SundaySplit 11
L#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Kim Edwards5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDEBORAH WELLS vs Allyson Wood6-1, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Holtzman 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 02
L#1 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Jennifer Newkirk3-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJane Forbes Fields vs Joanna Ashe2-6, 0-6
2025-09-28vs Gonzalez 3.0W Fall Singles SundayWon 21
L#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Diana Angeles6-0, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Rhonda Wakefield6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesJane Forbes Fields vs Meredith Vaughn6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Kelen Walker1-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Kathy Falls5-7, 5-7
L#3 SinglesSarah Lopatka vs Jamie Cunningham2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Cathers vs Sharlotte Brooks2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Louise Albright6-1, 6-2
W#3 SinglesSarah Lopatka vs Emily Owen6-3, 6-7, 1-0
2025-08-24vs Kuebert 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 12
W#1 SinglesKathleen Mooney vs Suki Gutierrez6-1, 6-3
L#2 SinglesJane Forbes Fields vs Tara Rusiewicz0-6, 0-6
L#3 SinglesSarah Lopatka vs Kylie Roy2-6, 3-6
2025-08-17vs Olalere 3.0W Fall Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesSammie Jo McCluskey vs Rachel Bryant4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJennifer Ayers vs Angela Olalere6-4, 6-0
L#3 SinglesSandy Cathers vs Shannon Smith1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Fall Singles have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
DEBORAH WELLS
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
3.05
Kathleen Mooney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.99
Sandy Cathers
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.97
Sammie Jo McCluskey
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Jane Forbes Fields
usually #3 Singles 60%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.89
Jennifer Ayers
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.63
Tori Swanson
published
Sarah Lopatka
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathleen Mooney + Jennifer Ayers5063% games+12.8% vs expected
Sandy Cathers + DEBORAH WELLS213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
DEBORAH WELLS
30W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%36%64%
3.05
Kathleen Mooney
27W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
Sandy Cathers
25W–17L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Sammie Jo McCluskey
34W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Jane Forbes Fields
28W–19L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jennifer Ayers
37W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
Tori Swanson
9W–16L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
2.63
Nakisha Boulware Watts
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sarah Lopatka
1W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.