Teams

Watters/18/2.5/WCD/POTC

2023 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Day · 2.5 Shrev

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.90
Jane Dickson
published
2.89
Emily Dickson
published 3
2.87
Lindsey Cotton
published
2.81
Laura Love
published
2.78
Hallie McHalffey
published 3
2.63
Meredith Evans
published
2.63
Sara Greer
published
2.58
Sonia Godfrey
published
2.48
Kristen Watters
published
2.45
Leigh Pasquier
published
2.19
Kelly Schmidt
published
2.14
Nikki Hanna
published
Sarah Lattimore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Love + Emily Dickson3550% games−9.2% vs expected
Nikki Hanna + Kelly Schmidt044 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Mitchell + Sonia Godfrey314 matchesnot enough data
Laura Love + Meredith Evans224 matchesnot enough data
Emily Dickson + Jane Dickson213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jane Dickson
26W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
2.90
3
Emily Dickson
23W–17L career · no lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
2.89
Lindsey Cotton
44W–43L career · no lines in 2023
<1%83%17%
2.87
Laura Love
25W–23L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Brittany Mitchell
51W–46L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%4%
2.78
3
Hallie McHalffey
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Meredith Evans
22W–18L career · no lines in 2023
15%85%<1%
2.63
Sara Greer
18W–13L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
2.63
Sonia Godfrey
11W–10L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
2.58
Kristen Watters
29W–34L career · no lines in 2023
58%42%<1%
2.48
Leigh Pasquier
6W–7L career · no lines in 2023
64%36%<1%
2.45
Kelly Schmidt
6W–31L career · no lines in 2023
0%99%1%
2.19
Nikki Hanna
11W–41L career · no lines in 2023
0%>99%<1%
2.14
Sarah Lattimore
0W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.