Teams

Conrad/Memphis

2026 Adult 18 & Over -Memphis · 2.5 Women 18 & over

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-04-29vs McLaughlin/MemphisWon 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Cleeton / Sarah Conrad vs Liza Easley / Bobbie Wonderly McLaughlin6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesFarley Ezekiel / Tressa Ogles vs Doriann Fairchild / Lauren Price6-3, 6-1
2026-04-22vs Greer/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesTressa Ogles / Mary Anne Pohlman vs Emily Mcallister / Kristen Bell7-6, 7-5
L#1 SinglesLaura Connerley vs Mary Margaret Posey4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTaylor Weston / Mary-Grace Gentry vs Leigh Lamb / Whitney Greer5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-04-15vs Ferrara/MemphisSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAllison Cleeton / Mary Anne Pohlman vs Shaila Anderson / Cheryl Hitchcock6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTaylor Weston / Mary Claire Phillips vs Kim Badger / Teresa Donahue6-7, 2-6
2026-04-08vs Jussely/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesSarah Conrad / Mary-Grace Gentry vs KIMBERLY JUSSELY / Holly Cousar7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLaura Connerley vs Anne von Lanken1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTressa Ogles / Farley Ezekiel vs Laura Weaver / Hannah Hackett1-6, 2-6
2026-04-01vs Dahlgren/MemphisLost 12
L#1 DoublesAllison Cleeton / Mary-Grace Gentry vs Wendy Spas / Kim Nichols3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesMary Anne Pohlman vs Jeressia Williamson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMary Claire Phillips / Chantall Jenkins vs Kelly Richardson Dahlgren / Lisa Warren0-6, 1-6
2026-03-25vs Powers/MemphisLost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Conrad / Mary Anne Pohlman vs Amber McCabe / Anna Smith7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFarley Ezekiel / Amanda Ricketts vs Jocelyn Brunotte / Malone Phillips2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-03-18vs Magness/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Cleeton / Mary-Grace Gentry vs Tracy Gallagher / Julia Magness6-4, 7-6
W#1 SinglesSarah Conrad vs Peyton Walker6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTressa Ogles / Amanda Ricketts vs Brooke Davis / Margaret Reid4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women 18 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.16 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.36
Mary-Grace Gentry
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.33
Sarah Conrad
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.27
Mary Anne Pohlman
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Chantall Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.19
Allison Cleeton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Laura Connerley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.06
Tressa Ogles
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
1.98
Taylor Weston
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.93
Amanda Ricketts
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Mary Claire Phillips
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tressa Ogles + Mary Anne Pohlman2336% gamesnot enough data
Mary-Grace Gentry + Allison Cleeton224 matchesnot enough data
Allison Cleeton + Mary Anne Pohlman224 matchesnot enough data
Mary-Grace Gentry + Sarah Conrad123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary-Grace Gentry
7W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%85%15%
2.36
Sarah Conrad
10W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%89%11%
2.33
Mary Anne Pohlman
11W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
2.5
Chantall Jenkins
0W–2L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
2.5
Allison Cleeton
8W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.19
Laura Connerley
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17
Tressa Ogles
3W–11L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Taylor Weston
2W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.98
2.5
Amanda Ricketts
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
Mary Claire Phillips
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.