Teams

ALACHUA/Schafer

2022 Alachua Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-24vs DB - LaiWon 30
W#1 DoublesNicholas Dodson - (DQ)* / Chad Schafer vs Jian Pu / Kewei Xu6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBoris Kuchuk / Ed Stark vs Frank Kenlon / Song Lai6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAlbert Sloan / Paul Wesson vs Chetan Sharma / Jixiu Shan6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2022-07-23vs Westside - Ferguson/SpinkLost 01
L#3 DoublesPaul Wesson / Chad Schafer vs Cory Hanson / Enrique Vargas2-6, 3-6
2022-07-17vs Westside - Ferguson/SpinkLost 01
L#2 DoublesEd Stark / Juan Torres vs Austin Manning / Zacharia Tharakan2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2022-07-15vs DB - LaiSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEd Stark / Steve Pratscher vs Kewei Xu / Jerry Lu6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesPaul Wesson / Paul Askew vs Lawrence Hooghuis / David Lerner3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-06-26vs Westside - Ferguson/SpinkWon 20
W#1 DoublesChad Schafer / Juan Torres vs Cory Hanson / Timothy Ferguson6-4, 7-6
W#3 DoublesEd Stark / Michael Tooke vs Camilo Fita / John Weissler6-3, 7-6
2022-06-13vs DB - LaiWon 20
W#1 DoublesNicholas Dodson - (DQ)* / Chad Schafer vs Jerry Lu / Jian Pu6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesWilliam Haveman / Paul Wesson vs Lawrence Hooghuis / Song Lai7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2022-06-05vs Westside - Ferguson/SpinkWon 10
W#3 DoublesChad Schafer / Ed Stark vs Zacharia Tharakan / Scott Wright6-4, 6-4
2022-06-03vs DB - LaiWon 10
W#2 DoublesEd Stark / Boris Kuchuk vs Song Lai / Lawrence Hooghuis6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Juan Torres
published
3.63
Boris Kuchuk
published 4
3.52
Paul Wesson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Chad Schafer
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.42
William Haveman
published
3.38
Ed Stark
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Paul Askew
published
Scott Rowe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Schafer + Ed Stark8263% gamesnot enough data
Chad Schafer + Paul Wesson314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Juan Torres
8W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Boris Kuchuk
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Paul Wesson
123W–72L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Chad Schafer
109W–61L career · 6 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
3.45
William Haveman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Ed Stark
288W–120L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Paul Askew
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Scott Rowe
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.