Teams

Guerra

2025 Tri Level · 4.5 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-19vs CreechWon 10
W#2 DoublesEllie Aragon / Landrey Posey vs Courtney Carthel / Lauren Hall6-2, 6-0
2025-10-18vs CreechLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharity White / Landrey Posey vs Holly Creech / Lauren Hall4-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-10-18vs CreechWon 10
W#2 DoublesCharity White / Ellie Aragon vs Holly Creech / Sonja Clark7-6, 6-2
2025-10-05vs CreechWon 10
W#1 DoublesEllie Aragon / Landrey Posey vs Holly Creech / Martha Schroeder7-5, 7-6
2025-10-04vs CreechWon 20
W#2 DoublesLandrey Posey / Katia Mathews vs Martha Schroeder / Holly Creech7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEllie Aragon / Magda Arreola vs Khin Lwin / Gainor Davis6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Ellie Aragon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.97
Landrey Posey
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.91
Courtney Vanderham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Blake Ware
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.79
Charity White
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.75
Sloane Ware
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.69
Magda Arreola
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.67
Brianna Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.35
Meaghan Collier
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Katia Mathews
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Seren Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Blake Ware + Sloane Ware6066% games+5.8% vs expected
Ellie Aragon + Landrey Posey404 matchesnot enough data
Blake Ware + Charity White404 matchesnot enough data
Magda Arreola + Meaghan Collier213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ellie Aragon
18W–3L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
4.04
Landrey Posey
11W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.97
4
Courtney Vanderham
15W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%74%25%
3.91
3.5
Blake Ware
11W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.82
4
Charity White
21W–8L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.79
Sloane Ware
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%4%96%
3.75
Magda Arreola
14W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.69
4
Brianna Guerra
12W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%88%1%
3.67
Meaghan Collier
7W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Katia Mathews
5W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Seren Wilson
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.