Teams

LA - Ladybugs 3.0-4.0

2025 SoCal Tri-Level - LA · LA - Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-14vs LA - Ace AngelsLost 01
L#2 DoublesBecky Leibowitz / Kate Hader vs Marguerite Harrop / Julie Warshaw2-6, 1-6
2025-08-24vs LA - Don't Tri MeLost 01
L#1 DoublesNat Newton / Becky Leibowitz vs Karen Haltrecht / Antonieta Monaldi4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Nat Newton
published
3.52
Becky Leibowitz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.99
Sally Ngo
published
2.94
Christine O'Neal
published 3
2.76
Randi Robins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Heidi Reed
published
2.59
Vy Bui
published
2.38
Luz Herrera
published
Jackie Vo
published
Marissa Meier
published
Sammie Xiao
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Luz Herrera + Christine O'Neal224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nat Newton
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
3.5
Becky Leibowitz
40W–26L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.52
Sally Ngo
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Christine O'Neal
12W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Randi Robins
3W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Heidi Reed
9W–3L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Vy Bui
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
25%74%<1%
2.59
Luz Herrera
7W–14L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Jackie Vo
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Marissa Meier
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sammie Xiao
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.