← Teams

McMullen Halm

2022 Pinellas Mixed 40 & Over Winter · 7.0 MXD

11 players · average NTRP 3.57 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-03-20vs RCSP BlueLost 0–1
L#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Karen Fischer vs Jorge Alvarado / Kristin Blair6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-13vs Countryside Crossbay Tennis TeamLost 0–1
L#1 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Karen Fischer vs Bob Murdock / Martha Cornatzer6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-03vs Seminole Lake Coke MixedLost 0–2
L#1 DoublesKaren Fischer / Sven Folmer vs Deborah Larsen / Shaji Joseph2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAllison Guerra / Paul Solorzano vs JoAnn Lind / Jose Dsa3-6, 5-7
2022-02-13Won 1–0
W#2 DoublesAndrew DePasquale / Irene Hughes vs John Hagman / Krystal Gardiner7-5, 6-2
2022-02-12vs Treasure Bay XWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesAllison Guerra / Sven Folmer vs Sherrl Fry / Jonathan Thompson6-4, 6-1
2022-01-30vs Pinellas - ELW/OrrLost 1–2
L#1 DoublesKaren Fischer / Sven Folmer vs Morgan Domson / Tom Milligan4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesIrene Hughes / Andrew DePasquale vs Teresa Orr / Kyle Valby1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Guerra / Paul Solorzano vs Dane Houston / Robyn Houston6-3, 6-4
2022-01-24vs Countryside WalkerWon 1–0
W#1 DoublesDonna Irwin / Sven Folmer vs Kathy Pisciotta / John Pisciotta6-2, 6-3
2022-01-23vs RCSP YellowWon 1–0
W#2 DoublesSven Folmer / Karen Fischer vs Cathrine Chin / Alan Chin6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MXD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Allison Guerra
published 4
3.48
3.45
Brandon Halm
published 3.5
3.33
Robin Gerlach
published —
3.30
Andrew DePasquale
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Donna Irwin
published 3.5
—
George Hawkins
published 3.5
3.12
Karen Fischer
published —
3.00
Paul Solorzano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.93
Philip Gerlach
published —
—
Sven Folmer
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published —
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Gerlach + Robin Gerlach0–33 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Allison Guerra
10W–6L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
3.5
Edwin Alejandro-Vega
8W–16L career · no lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
3.48
3.5
Brandon Halm
26W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
3.45
—
Robin Gerlach
6W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.33
3.5
Andrew DePasquale
105W–71L career · 4 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Donna Irwin
18W–27L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
George Hawkins
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
—
—
Karen Fischer
5W–13L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Paul Solorzano
69W–49L career · 2 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
3.00
—
Philip Gerlach
4W–20L career · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
—
Sven Folmer
23W–13L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.