Teams

Sportime

2023 18&Over Men · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-07-30vs Northern: Roll the Bones 18+Lost 12
L#1 DoublesScott Hefley / Syed Saeed vs Jack Ross / Connor Darcy1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDave Netoskie / Padam Singh vs Paul Warren / Muhammad Khan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesEvan Adelstein / Brandon Frew vs Dong-Ha Chung / William Mann6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-07-26vs Northern: Roll the Bones 18+Lost 13
L#1 DoublesAden Haas / Syed Saeed vs Paul Warren / Chris Hanley2-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesScott Hefley vs Greg Reo2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesPadam Singh / Alberto Cestero vs Dong-Ha Chung / Thomas Begley7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEugene Barash / Terry Casillo vs Emiliano Torlasco / Joshua Fields0-6, 4-6
2023-07-19vs Chin 18+ 4.0Won 32
L#1 DoublesScott Hefley / Syed Saeed vs Jeremy Taylor / Kevin O'Connor6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlfredo Achilles vs Andy Sink6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAlberto Cestero / Aden Haas vs Ryan Conley / Rajesh Padmanabhan6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesEugene Barash vs Benjamin Paultre6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAli Albaker / Padam Singh vs Dana Hood / James Galliher6-7, 1-6
2023-07-05vs Northern: Roll the Bones 18+Split 22
L#1 DoublesPadam Singh / Ali Albaker vs Darren Stohr / Jack Ross3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesAlfredo Achilles vs Greg Reo6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrandon Frew / Eugene Barash vs Thomas Begley / Paul Warren2-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAlberto Cestero / Dave Netoskie vs Michael Tram / Muhammad Khan6-1, 7-5
2023-07-01vs Northern: Roll the Bones 18+Lost 04
L#1 DoublesScott Hefley / Syed Saeed vs Connor Darcy / Jack Ross6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesAlfredo Achilles vs Greg Reo7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesEugene Barash / Stan Timofeev vs Eric Stotsky / Paul Warren4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAli Albaker / Dave Netoskie vs William Mann / Michael Tram3-6, 3-6
2023-06-28vs Chin 18+ 4.0Won 32
L#1 DoublesTerry Casillo / Arvind Subramanian vs Brent Smith / Jeremy Taylor4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesAlfredo Achilles vs Gary Henning6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesEugene Barash / Stan Timofeev vs James Galliher / Kevin O'Connor4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesScott Hefley vs Rajesh Padmanabhan6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPadam Singh / Alberto Cestero vs Benjamin Paultre / Andrew Matthews6-3, 7-6
2023-05-17vs Chin 18+ 4.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBrandon Frew / Alberto Cestero vs Dana Hood / Varun Gandhi1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAlfredo Achilles vs Paul Tigg4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesArvind Subramanian / Evan Adelstein vs Kevin O'Connor / Ryan Luna1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Alfredo Achilles
usually #1 Singles 64%, also #2 Singles 27% · published 4.5
3.88
Ali Albaker
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.63
Alec Cohen
published 4
3.57
Scott Hefley
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.41
Dave Netoskie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Alberto Cestero
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.00
Peter Green
published
2.96
Eugene Barash
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Evan Adelstein
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Padam Singh
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Syed Saeed
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Terry Casillo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dave Netoskie + Ali Albaker1541% games−3.9% vs expected
Scott Hefley + Syed Saeed2543% games−6.3% vs expected
Eugene Barash + Peter Green044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Alfredo Achilles
26W–30L career · 11 lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Ali Albaker
45W–46L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.88
4
Alec Cohen
26W–23L career · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Scott Hefley
14W–30L career · 5 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Dave Netoskie
15W–32L career · 3 lines in 2023
74%26%<1%
3.41
3.5
Alberto Cestero
5W–6L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Peter Green
6W–30L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
3.00
Eugene Barash
7W–37L career · 5 lines in 2023
61%39%<1%
2.96
Evan Adelstein
4W–20L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Padam Singh
14W–42L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Syed Saeed
51W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Terry Casillo
8W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.