Teams

McACTEE - STONELEIGH GC

2022 Loudoun Combo Women · Loudoun Women's 5.5 Combo league

8 players · average NTRP 3.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-09-19vs MARPLE- River CreekWon 20
W#1 DoublesDebora Aldridge / Katie Budnyk vs Karen Sullivan / Alexandra Robinson6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMelissa Haugh / Renee Gupp vs Ashley Whitner / Madison Humerick6-4, 7-5
2022-09-13Won 10
W#1 DoublesDebora Aldridge / Katie Budnyk vs Valerie Souchack / Nancy Shepley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-08-29vs MARPLE- River CreekWon 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Bauer / Katie Budnyk vs Julie Kane / Elle Sullivant6-1, 6-3
2022-08-22vs FEIT/BIXLER - AVSPWon 20
W#1 DoublesAndrea Bauer / Melissa Haugh vs Sarah Blackwood / Marlys Nylund1-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDebora Aldridge / Katie Budnyk vs Brandy Johns / Liz Ryan6-1, 6-3
2022-08-19vs HOLGUIN - A.FARMSLost 12
L#1 DoublesDebora Aldridge / Elizabeth McDonald vs Nancy Shepley / Karen Keller3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTamra Howard-McAtee / Ashleigh Dickerson vs Janann Mercker / Shelley Owens7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesRenee Gupp / Melissa Haugh vs Kimberly Fulham / Stephanie Holguin7-6, 6-0
2022-08-08Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDebora Aldridge / Jackie Washam vs Ana Gumbiner / Shelley Winants2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesKatie Budnyk / Melissa Haugh vs Jennifer Graham / Frankie Smith5-7, 5-5
2022-08-01vs MARPLE- River CreekSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAndrea Bauer / Katie Budnyk vs Karen Sullivan / Julianne Nitta6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAubrei Kucera / Tamra Howard-McAtee vs Tosha Clark / Jennifer Malloy6-4, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Loudoun Women's 5.5 Combo league have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.36
Aubrei Kucera
published 3.5
3.34
Katie Budnyk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.95
2.79
Tamra Howard-McAtee
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.67
Debora Aldridge
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.63
Melissa Haugh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
Lauren Farrow
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Debora Aldridge + Tamra Howard-McAtee7947% games−1.5% vs expected
Debora Aldridge + Katie Budnyk7452% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Aubrei Kucera
3W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Katie Budnyk
67W–65L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3
Elizabeth McDonald
11W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Tamra Howard-McAtee
40W–55L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Ashleigh Dickerson
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Debora Aldridge
82W–159L career · 5 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Melissa Haugh
31W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
Lauren Farrow
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.