Teams

Maute/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.20 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-07vs Gardner/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Carswell / Anna Monarch vs Tiffany Webb / Laurie Lindahl4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKelci Slagle vs Renee Sprouse5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesChelsea Maute / Sarah Henderson vs Rita Thome / Micki Martin1-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesMeredith Buckner vs Liz Mcclain6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesEda Pratt / Elizabeth Justus vs Katie Buehler / Julie Harano3-6, 1-6
2025-04-30vs Douglas-Spurgin/KnoxvilleWon 41
L#1 DoublesEda Pratt / Mimi Rust vs Emily Mcclenagan / Laura Spurgin5-7, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMeredith Buckner vs Jace Lundstrom6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesAlyssa Weagley / Sarah Henderson vs Alison Kitchiner / Jenna Gomes6-0, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChelsea Maute vs Tiffany Barton3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAnna Monarch / Suzanne Carswell vs Laura Brumit / Carolina Lyngh6-4, 6-3
2025-04-16vs Gardner/KnoxvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMimi Rust / Heather Ridenour vs Laurie Lindahl / Vallie Collins1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesChelsea Maute vs Renee Sprouse3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSarah Henderson / Lilly Tams vs Amber Davis / Susan Bishofberger6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEda Pratt / Elizabeth Justus vs Amanda Miles / Julie Harano6-4, 7-5
2025-04-09vs Douglas-Spurgin/KnoxvilleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnna Monarch / Suzanne Carswell vs Tracey Belmont / Linda Roback2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Henderson / Alyssa Weagley vs Lake Bailey / Laura Warrick4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 SinglesChelsea Maute vs Pearl Jhala6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLilly Tams / Kelci Slagle vs Laura Spurgin / Alison Kitchiner2-6, 0-6
2025-03-30vs Douglas-Spurgin/KnoxvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesHeather Ridenour / Eda Pratt vs Jessica Jorgensen / Jace Lundstrom6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMeredith Buckner vs Tiffany Barton7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnna Monarch / Sarah Henderson vs Jenna Gomes / Alison Kitchiner3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLilly Tams vs Lake Bailey2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesAmanda Niethammer / Chelsea Maute vs Laura Warrick / Linda Roback5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2025-03-26vs Gardner/KnoxvilleLost 13
L#1 DoublesEda Pratt / Anna Monarch vs Rita Thome / Micki Martin3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMimi Rust / Kelci Slagle vs Tiffany Webb / Amber Davis0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesChelsea Maute vs Abigail Jumper6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Carswell / Elizabeth Justus vs Katie Buehler / Alyssa Sprouse4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.03 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Eda Pratt
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
Chelsea Maute
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.19
Meredith Buckner
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.01
Elizabeth Justus
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.00
Cassidy Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.98
Heather Ridenour
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #2 Doubles 13% · published
2.95
Amanda Niethammer
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Suzanne Carswell
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Alyssa Weagley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.91
Anna Monarch
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.69
Mimi Rust
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
Kelci Slagle
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Lilly Tams
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chelsea Maute + Meredith Buckner3353% games+11.8% vs expected
Mimi Rust + Heather Ridenour6645% games+6.2% vs expected
Amanda Niethammer + Heather Ridenour1646% games+5.5% vs expected
Anna Monarch + Suzanne Carswell4944% games+1.7% vs expected
Chelsea Maute + Amanda Niethammer224 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Niethammer + Mimi Rust314 matchesnot enough data
Meredith Buckner + Mimi Rust314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Justus + Eda Pratt123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eda Pratt
11W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%61%38%
3.46
3.5
Chelsea Maute
17W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Meredith Buckner
35W–11L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%9%91%
3.19
Elizabeth Justus
23W–18L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
3
Cassidy Hawkins
13W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%51%49%
3.00
Heather Ridenour
18W–21L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
3
Amanda Niethammer
25W–18L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Suzanne Carswell
27W–26L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Alyssa Weagley
24W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
3.5
Anna Monarch
7W–20L career · 5 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Mimi Rust
16W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.69
Kelci Slagle
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lilly Tams
3W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.