Teams

Raintree Raqueteers Raghavan

2024 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight Men · Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-05-30Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEdward Yesbeck / Cory Connell vs Andy Tucker / Ben Hall6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2024-05-02vs Belmont Richman BrownLost 01
L#2 DoublesStuart Dowdy / Edward Yesbeck vs Majd Babik / Michael Baxter4-6, 2-6
2024-04-18vs ACAC HollomonWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarey Donovan / Edward Yesbeck vs William Crowe / Michael Blackburn4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weeknight 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Lee Brooks
published
3.82
Geoff Campbell
published 4
3.78
Cory Connell
published 4
3.77
Mahesh Sukumaran
published
3.77
Ram Raghavan
published
Gary Wills
published 4
3.74
Matthew Sheehan
published
3.68
Matthew Earle
published
3.66
Seunghun Ok
published
3.65
Carey Donovan
published 4
3.64
Edward Yesbeck
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.47
Madhav Kidambi
published
3.30
Stuart Dowdy
published
Yong Rhee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lee Brooks + Geoff Campbell6258% games−1.2% vs expected
Ram Raghavan + Mahesh Sukumaran303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lee Brooks
29W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%41%59%
4.03
4
Geoff Campbell
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Cory Connell
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
3.78
Mahesh Sukumaran
16W–15L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
Ram Raghavan
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%4%
3.77
4
Gary Wills
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Matthew Sheehan
2W–3L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.74
Matthew Earle
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
Seunghun Ok
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Carey Donovan
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
12%88%<1%
3.65
4
Edward Yesbeck
127W–115L career · 3 lines in 2024
14%85%<1%
3.64
Madhav Kidambi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
3.47
Stuart Dowdy
15W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
Yong Rhee
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.