Teams

GAC RED

2022 CTA TWILIGHT - DEN · MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT

7 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-09-05vs DTC PURPLELost 01
L#1 SinglesDevon Turnick vs Samuel Tessler1-6, 1-6
2022-08-29vs SKY REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Weinfeld / Tim Buchanan vs David Garrison / Scott Hermansen3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesDevon Turnick vs Bentley Hodges1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesHugo Serri / Nang Khoa Nguyen vs Todd Young / Andrew Sarka2-6, 4-6
2022-08-28vs EM REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesAndrew Weinfeld / Hugo Serri vs Jeff Sigman / TIMOTHY DENEZZA6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDevon Turnick vs Jason Dalbey6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNang Khoa Nguyen / Omkar Kirani vs Marty Volin / Luke Hanna6-2, 6-1
2022-08-22vs HG GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Buchanan / Andrew Weinfeld vs John Cadkin / Bryan Langman6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDevon Turnick vs Jay Vancik6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNang Khoa Nguyen / Omkar Kirani vs Mike Hendricks / Andrew Vega6-0, 7-5
2022-08-01vs SKY GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesMike Holmes / Omkar Kirani vs David Marom / Matt MacLachlan4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDevon Turnick vs Tom Parnell3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesNang Khoa Nguyen / Tim Buchanan vs John Bringenberg / Jason Dewees3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2022-07-25vs WC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesAndrew Weinfeld / Hugo Serri vs David Moreno / Pete Petrou5-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDevon Turnick vs Steve Pulver2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesOmkar Kirani / Nang Khoa Nguyen vs Dan Lyons / Eyal Tzarfati5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - TWILIGHT have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.52 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.52
Devon Turnick
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
Andrew Weinfeld
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Hugo Serri
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Mike Holmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Nang Khoa Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Omkar Kirani
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Tim Buchanan
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Buchanan + Andrew Weinfeld314 matchesnot enough data
Andrew Weinfeld + Mike Holmes213 matchesnot enough data
Omkar Kirani + Nang Khoa Nguyen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Devon Turnick
87W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%43%57%
3.52
3
Andrew Weinfeld
23W–8L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Hugo Serri
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mike Holmes
4W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Nang Khoa Nguyen
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Omkar Kirani
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tim Buchanan
19W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.