Teams

Legacy Park (Candace Cole)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 18 & Over Business Women - Regular · 4.0 Women (Lori Brown)

15 players · average NTRP 4.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-12-10Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline Quiroga / Linda Lahue vs Jessica Barba / Patricia Martin1-6, 0-6
2022-11-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLaura Gresham / Linda Lahue vs Renee Thibodeaux / Natalia Matthews2-6, 0-6
2022-11-19Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLinda Lahue / Laurie Robinson vs Kimberly Johnson / Jeannine Pelham-Young3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women (Lori Brown) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.56 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Mary Kang
published
3.79
Tammy Sisco
published
3.78
Stacie Lafleur
published
3.75
Dana Payne
published 4
3.64
Michelle Bowman
published
3.64
3.64
Denise Botelho
published 4
3.58
Candace Cole
published 4
3.43
Kristen Zignego
published
3.37
Stacey Tuchmann
published
3.36
Erin Michel
published
3.34
Tina Parker
published
3.22
Linda Lahue
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Loriann Thibodeaux
published
Susan Martin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Candace Cole + Tina Parker7154% games+4.6% vs expected
Stacey Tuchmann + Tina Parker5256% games+2.5% vs expected
Michelle Bowman + Tammy Sisco5057% games+1.9% vs expected
Christine Coffman + Candace Cole4448% games−2.3% vs expected
Kristen Zignego + Erin Michel7648% games−2.8% vs expected
Tammy Sisco + Mary Kang3250% games−3.2% vs expected
Christine Coffman + Stacie Lafleur6259% games−6.6% vs expected
Michelle Bowman + Mary Kang4257% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mary Kang
40W–25L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Tammy Sisco
35W–14L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.79
Stacie Lafleur
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Dana Payne
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.75
Michelle Bowman
41W–32L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Christine Coffman
27W–23L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Denise Botelho
7W–11L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
3.64
4
Candace Cole
33W–27L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Kristen Zignego
23W–39L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.43
Stacey Tuchmann
13W–15L career · no lines in 2023
83%17%<1%
3.37
Erin Michel
11W–21L career · no lines in 2023
84%16%<1%
3.36
Tina Parker
26W–21L career · no lines in 2023
87%13%<1%
3.34
Linda Lahue
32W–39L career · 3 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.22
Loriann Thibodeaux
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Susan Martin
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.