Teams

Hawkey, Summer

2025 Adult Mixed 18 & Over 6.0 - 10.0 · 6.0 Mixed

13 players · average NTRP 2.90 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-08-07vs HOA/Johnson/18&over6.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Brown / Krissi Wagner vs Mariko Johnson / Mitch Klingenberg1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMelanie Beck / David Beck vs Jamie Greber / Sean Kalic6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSummer Hawkey / Dustin Sherbert vs Olena Reid / Matthew Reid7-5, 2-4, 0-1
2025-08-01vs Stevens, KatieWon 30
W#1 DoublesDavid Beck / Courtney Kathrens vs William Popplewell / Holly Cornelius6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBailey Potts / Alex Potts vs John Owens / Katie Stevens1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSummer Hawkey / Dustin Sherbert vs Prashant Vemireddy / Gina Marshall6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-18vs Courtney, MaggieLost 12
L#1 DoublesBailey Potts / Alex Potts vs Mark Mathy / Julie Ma4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKrissi Wagner / Thomas Brown vs Lorry Nelson / Maggie Courtney6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMegan Neville / Lance Neville vs Ken Riggins / Teresa Riggins2-6, 4-6
2025-07-11vs Pattabiraman, KarthickLost 12
L#1 DoublesKrissi Wagner / Thomas Brown vs RAGHURAMAN RAMASUBBU / Beth Wood4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesDavid Beck / Emily Griggs vs Keith Luchtel / Nina Whitmore4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAlex Potts / Bailey Potts vs Amy Fisch / Dan Pichler3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-06-20vs Stevens, KatieLost 12
W#1 DoublesDavid Beck / Melanie Beck vs Natasha Sohaib / Jeremy Turlin6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSummer Hawkey / Dustin Sherbert vs Katie Stevens / Luke Torgerson3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMegan Neville / Lance Neville vs Gina Marshall / Shelton Ross2-6, 6-7
2025-06-13vs HOA/Johnson/18&over6.0XLost 03
L#1 DoublesMelanie Beck / David Beck vs Wes Mikel / Megan Mikel2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesEmily Griggs / Will Griggs vs Taylor Hines / Kendall Kaut5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSummer Hawkey / Dustin Sherbert vs Sean Kalic / Kelley Frye0-6, 3-6
2025-06-06vs Courtney, MaggieWon 30
W#1 DoublesRachel Morrison / David Beck vs Maggie Courtney / James Henry6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesThomas Brown / Krissi Wagner vs Teresa Riggins / Ken Riggins6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesDustin Sherbert / Shelly Mowery vs Mark Mathy / Marion Ritter6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2025-05-30vs Pattabiraman, KarthickLost 03
L#1 DoublesAlex Potts / Bailey Potts vs Beth Wood / Dan Pichler2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSummer Hawkey / Dustin Sherbert vs Nina Whitmore / Keith Luchtel2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMegan Neville / Lance Neville vs Katie Carver / Sam Nave3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 6.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA/Johnson/18&over6.0X7116817165
2Stevens, Katie44101433215
3Hawkey, Summer26101434237
4Courtney, Maggie1781636246

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Rachel Morrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.00
Courtney Kathrens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Melanie Beck
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.88
Krissi Wagner
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.83
Will Griggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Shelly Mowery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Potts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Emily Griggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.43
Bailey Potts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.38
Summer Hawkey
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Dustin Sherbert
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Lance Neville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Megan Neville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Summer Hawkey + Dustin Sherbert1438% gamesnot enough data
Alex Potts + Bailey Potts134 matchesnot enough data
Megan Neville + Lance Neville033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Rachel Morrison
26W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.46
3
Courtney Kathrens
32W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
Melanie Beck
9W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.90
Krissi Wagner
71W–84L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.88
Will Griggs
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
2.83
Shelly Mowery
31W–39L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Alex Potts
1W–3L career · type M · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Emily Griggs
1W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Bailey Potts
1W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
2.43
Summer Hawkey
1W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
82%18%<1%
2.38
2.5
Dustin Sherbert
2W–4L career · type M · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lance Neville
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Megan Neville
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.