Teams

RLatson-DUR

2026 Eno River Singles 18 & Over · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening

7 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-06-29vs SBartle-DURWon 21
W#1 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Lindsey Morgan6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesRuitian Yan vs Nikki Fackler6-3, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRachel Latson vs Wenjia Yang3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-06-26vs ABoone-TOCHWon 21
L#1 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Meredith Bazemore4-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSophia Ewing vs Angela Boone6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRuitian Yan vs Kait Mckee6-3, 6-0
2026-06-19vs JCollins-SVCWon 20
W#1 SinglesHannah Gahagan vs Austin Regnerus5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKristy Dumlao vs Lori Small6-2, 6-0
2026-06-05vs AWallace-DURSplit 11
W#1 SinglesHannah Gahagan vs Donnetta Hanson6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesKristy Dumlao vs Nora Mishriky2-6, 5-7
2026-05-29vs ABoone-TOCHWon 20
W#1 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Meredith Bazemore6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs Holly Baker6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2026-05-22Lost 01
L#1 SinglesRachel Latson vs Beth Gifford1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-15vs MBehan-HVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesHannah Gahagan vs Lindsay Kolzet6-0, 6-1
W#2 SinglesSophia Ewing vs Maria Behan6-1, 6-3
2026-05-08vs SBartle-DURWon 30
W#1 SinglesEmily Patulski vs Kristen Anderson6-2, 6-2
W#2 SinglesSusanne Schmal vs MacKenzie Patrick6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesRuitian Yan vs Jennifer Harrell6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · 18 & Over Singles 2.5 Women Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AWallace-DUR6217715157
2RLatson-DUR6217716135
3ABoone-TOCH5315923189
4MBehan-HVCC2661836236

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.54 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.82
Sophia Ewing
usually #3 Singles 71%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.68
Hannah Gahagan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.60
Ruitian Yan
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.58
Emily Patulski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.53
Susanne Schmal
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.42
Kristy Dumlao
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.14
Rachel Latson
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hannah Gahagan + Ruitian Yan213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sophia Ewing
24W–9L career · 7 lines in 2026
0%1%99%
2.82
Hannah Gahagan
14W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
Ruitian Yan
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%24%76%
2.60
2.5
Emily Patulski
39W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%29%71%
2.58
2.5
Susanne Schmal
60W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
0%43%57%
2.53
Kristy Dumlao
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%72%28%
2.42
Rachel Latson
4W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.14

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.