Teams

WSolomon/Nichols (Carmel)

2022 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-02vs HBarney (Weddington)Won 10
W#2 DoublesWendy Solomon / Robin Mermans vs Jacqui Gentile / Heidi Barney6-3, 6-0
2022-04-04vs KWainscott/McWilliams (OPRC)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMaria Mascia / Robin Mermans vs Kate Wagner / Christina McWilliams0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesTanya Willett / Paris Loesch vs Deborah Toomey / Cindy McDowell6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2022-03-28vs HBarney (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesMaria Mascia / Robin Mermans vs Brandi Hoover / Anne Cutts6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesParis Loesch / Elizabeth Workman vs Sandra Torres / Kimberly Clark6-0, 6-3
2022-03-07vs TWalker (Carmel)Won 10
W#1 DoublesTanya Willett / Paris Loesch vs Lauren Mulligan / Sheri Sayman7-6, 6-2
2022-02-28vs MJones (Life Time)Won 10
W#1 DoublesRobin Mermans / Paige Whitney vs Leslie Masucci / Karen Schneider6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.55 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Maria Mascia
published
3.81
Whitney Smith
published
3.80
Paige Whitney
published
3.66
Robin Mermans
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.65
Katherine Melvin
published
3.48
Wendy Solomon
published
3.47
Paris Loesch
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.34
Jill Halverstam
published 3.5
3.23
Tanya Willett
published
3.22
Molly Morris
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Solomon + Whitney Smith224 matchesnot enough data
Jill Halverstam + Robin Mermans213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maria Mascia
8W–21L career · no lines in 2022
80%20%<1%
3.89
Whitney Smith
26W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.81
Paige Whitney
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
3.5
Robin Mermans
35W–25L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%12%88%
3.66
Katherine Melvin
19W–13L career · no lines in 2022
12%87%<1%
3.65
Wendy Solomon
13W–18L career · no lines in 2022
57%43%<1%
3.48
3.5
Paris Loesch
33W–22L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%59%41%
3.47
3.5
Jill Halverstam
91W–46L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
Tanya Willett
10W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Molly Morris
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
5%94%2%
3.22

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.