Teams

You’ve Been Served

2026 Tri-Level League · Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.10 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-12vs TerminettersWon 10
W#1 DoublesJoy Meltzer / Pinky Cruz-Osterman vs Virginia Kaklamani / Danielle Spencer6-2, 6-1
2025-10-11vs Let's Talk About SetsWon 20
W#1 DoublesKristen Fowler / Pinky Cruz-Osterman vs Virginia Kaklamani / Julie Alvarez6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAmanda Mays / Michele Brink vs Dalia Martinez / Martha Dellano6-2, 6-2
2025-10-05vs Lady LUXEWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Brink / Donna Talley vs Lori Martin / Faith Horan7-6, 6-4
2025-10-05vs Shavano Lethal LadiesLost 01
L#1 DoublesVictoria Nanos / Joanne Sundin vs Tami Wheeler / Terrie Butcher5-7, 6-1, 0-1
2025-10-04vs Backhanded ComplimentsWon 10
W#2 DoublesDalia Martinez / Michele Brink vs Alexia Nadler / Marina Henkes7-5, 6-3
2025-10-03vs Trio AmigosWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Brink / Donna Talley vs Kelly Grossman / JESSICA Sills6-2, 6-2
2025-10-03vs TerminettersLost 01
L#1 DoublesJudy Sotelo / Joanne Sundin vs Angela Avila / Melissa Maddox2-6, 1-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.5, 4.0, 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.94 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.54
Stacey Boebel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Joy Meltzer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Catherine Herlich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.18
Pinky Cruz-Osterman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.16
Kristen Fowler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.13
Courtney O'Daniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.10
Audra Worrich
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
4.08
Kirstin Clark
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
4.03
Melody Garcia
published
3.58
Joanne Sundin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Michele Brink
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.46
Amanda Mays
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Kara Still
published
Maegan Jackson
published
Milessa Jannik
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirstin Clark + Audra Worrich6264% games+12.8% vs expected
Stacey Boebel + Courtney O'Daniel123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stacey Boebel
16W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.54
Joy Meltzer
17W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Catherine Herlich
2W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Pinky Cruz-Osterman
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Kristen Fowler
8W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
11%89%<1%
4.16
4.5
Courtney O'Daniel
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Audra Worrich
25W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
4.10
Kirstin Clark
42W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
4.08
Melody Garcia
23W–6L career · no lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
4.03
4
Amanda Stephenson
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Joanne Sundin
10W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.58
Michele Brink
30W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Amanda Mays
22W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
Kara Still
20W–5L career · no lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.21
Maegan Jackson
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Milessa Jannik
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.