Teams

Kirby / 8.5 40+ Combo

2024 Combo 40 & Over- Knoxville · 8.5 Women Combo Doubles

5 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-28vs Houck/Knoxville/C40Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKristie Danby / Melissa Kirby vs Brooke Dill / Nazo Burgy6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesRobin Smith / Stacey Bristow vs Chieko Lambert / Kristin Coffey6-7, 6-2, 0-1
2024-09-14vs Houck/Knoxville/C40Lost 02
L#1 DoublesKristie Danby / Stacey Bristow vs Brooke Dill / Nazo Burgy6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDena Teague / Kathy Smith vs Angela Strange / Kristin Coffey6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-03vs Houck/Knoxville/C40Split 11
W#2 DoublesKristie Danby / Melissa Kirby vs Barbara Miller / Elena Burns6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Lindsay McNabb vs Nazo Burgy / Lindsey Stimets2-6, 3-6
2024-08-17vs Houck/Knoxville/C40Split 11
L#2 DoublesJennifer Brady / Stacey Bristow vs Deidra Dunn / Lindsey Stimets0-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Kaak / Lynn Johnson vs Angela Strange / Sandi Wilson6-0, 7-6
2024-08-10vs Houck/Knoxville/C40Won 21
W#1 DoublesChristina Kaak / Suzanne Miller vs Deidra Dunn / Chieko Lambert7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Brady / Dena Teague vs Allison Chandler / Laura Ivey6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLynn Johnson / Lindsay McNabb vs Natalie Deel / Lindsey Stimets0-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.5 Women Combo Doubles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Houck/Knoxville/C404212619160
2Kirby / 8.5 40+ Combo2461225174

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.89 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.16
Kristie Danby
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.98
Christina Kaak
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.92
Dena Teague
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.73
Lindsay McNabb
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Stacey Bristow
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lindsay McNabb + Dena Teague6070% games+6.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristie Danby
33W–26L career · 3 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
4.16
4
Christina Kaak
22W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%55%44%
3.98
4
Dena Teague
60W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%73%27%
3.92
Lindsay McNabb
36W–23L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.73
Stacey Bristow
33W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.