Teams

LKWD - Schoen/Eleazer

2025 Adult 40 & Over Women Winter Day - Mobile · 3.5 Women Winter Day 40+

16 players · average NTRP 3.67 / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-11vs Lott Park - Weed/RushWon 41
L#1 DoublesJaime Cooper / Turner Eleazer vs Tammy Rush / Terri Ammons4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMolly Spain vs Robina McDaniel6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesRobin Coleman / Holli Parks vs Molly Wagner / Robin Kollmansberger6-3, 7-5
W#3 DoublesWanda Schoen / Anna Bruckmann vs Mary Bradley / Susan Clark6-3, 6-3
W#4 DoublesCathy Spehar / Leighton Mosteller vs Kimberly Weed / Ruth Rye6-2, 6-3
2025-01-14vs Fairhope - Sandefur/MatzengerWon 50
W#1 DoublesJaime Cooper / Diane Kierpa vs Janet Hurley / Pam Stein5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesGini Coody vs Mary Lee Matzenger6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Newman / Turner Eleazer vs Geri Cope / Stephanie Sandefur6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesCathy Spehar / Breana Duncan vs Cathy Feinstein / Martha Byrd6-3, 6-4
W#4 DoublesStella Martin / Anna Bruckmann vs Bridgette Dinelli / Faith Abshire6-0, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women Winter Day 40+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Anna Bruckmann
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
Diana Newman
published 4
3.53
Jaime Cooper
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Turner Eleazer
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.37
Molly Spain
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.27
Robin Coleman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Diane Kierpa
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Wanda Schoen
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.20
Holli Parks
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.16
Breana Duncan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Andrea Fugard
published 3.5
3.11
Gini Coody
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.10
Cathy Spehar
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.09
Leighton Mosteller
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
MARY KNOX Bixler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Stella Martin
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jaime Cooper + Turner Eleazer8360% games+5.6% vs expected
Andrea Fugard + Breana Duncan6456% games+3.1% vs expected
Jaime Cooper + Leighton Mosteller2348% games+2.5% vs expected
Holli Parks + Robin Coleman3251% games+0.1% vs expected
Anna Bruckmann + Turner Eleazer5355% games−2.3% vs expected
Andrea Fugard + Holli Parks3250% games−3.8% vs expected
Cathy Spehar + Diane Kierpa224 matchesnot enough data
Molly Spain + Wanda Schoen224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Bruckmann
44W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Diana Newman
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jaime Cooper
28W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.53
Turner Eleazer
48W–22L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.38
Molly Spain
22W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
Robin Coleman
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Diane Kierpa
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Wanda Schoen
8W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
Holli Parks
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Breana Duncan
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
12%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Andrea Fugard
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Gini Coody
42W–33L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%22%78%
3.11
3.5
Cathy Spehar
13W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.10
Leighton Mosteller
19W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
MARY KNOX Bixler
17W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Stella Martin
7W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.