Teams

MLF ORANGE

2025 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - NOCO · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-13vs LAC PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesLora Griffith / Cathy Simocko-Smith vs Amy Grolnick / Mary Ellen O'Rell7-5, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBernita Sterling / Jessica Bergen vs MARY WEISFOUT / Barbara Dingwall7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesKathy Carlson / Mariana Treat vs Brenda Laartz / Pam Smallwood6-2, 7-5
2025-06-10vs HMTC TEALWon 21
L#1 DoublesCindy Short / Cathy Simocko-Smith vs Diane Westlind / Michele MacHado5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesGeneva Ritsch / Kathy Carlson vs Lori Masi / Susan Seiler6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLora Griffith / Nancy Pajak vs Marne Engelking / Kathi Freemann7-6, 7-6
2025-05-30vs LT YELLOWWon 21
W#1 DoublesJessica Bergen / Kathy Carlson vs Janice Sale / Tina Spicer6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCindy Short / Geneva Ritsch vs Helen Migchelbrink / Ruth Dukart6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKelly Stout / Nancy Pajak vs Debbie Stechman / Kristen Philbrook6-0, 6-3
2025-05-23vs ETA BLUEWon 30
W#1 DoublesJessica Bergen / Kelly Stout vs Carolyn Gattis / Gail Sullivan6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNancy Pajak / Geneva Ritsch vs Cheryl Clausen / Koleen Schriever6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCathy Simocko-Smith / Bernita Sterling vs Alexina Campbell / Glenna Cook6-0, 6-2
2025-05-09vs CSU GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesKathy Carlson / Mariana Treat vs Maureen Maguire / Marcia Stauter6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBernita Sterling / Jessica Bergen vs Camille Benton / Leslie Taylor6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesCathy Simocko-Smith / Lora Griffith vs Kristin Henninger / Adelle Byra6-2, 6-1
2025-05-02vs CSU WHITEWon 21
W#1 DoublesGeneva Ritsch / Kelly Stout vs Carol Hiller / Sara Schaffer5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLora Griffith / Kathy Carlson vs Tracy Sanders / Kathleen Vandenberg6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMariana Treat / Bettina Cosima Larrarte vs Karen Johnson / Mary Hulse5-7, 6-1, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · WOMEN 6.0 - 55 & OVER - NOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MLF ORANGE601539123
2LT YELLOW3312614123
3LAC PURPLE3361227191
4ETA BLUE0611734216

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Cathy Simocko-Smith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.98
Bettina Cosima Larrarte
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.93
Kathy Carlson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.89
Nancy Pajak
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Kelly Stout
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.79
Cindy Short
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.71
Lora Griffith
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.59
Bernita Sterling
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Geneva Ritsch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jessica Bergen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Mariana Treat
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bernita Sterling + Jessica Bergen2539% games−9.0% vs expected
Bernita Sterling + Cathy Simocko-Smith7456% games−9.5% vs expected
Cindy Short + Cathy Simocko-Smith2356% gamesnot enough data
Lora Griffith + Bernita Sterling224 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Carlson + Jessica Bergen314 matchesnot enough data
Cindy Short + Mariana Treat123 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pajak + Bernita Sterling213 matchesnot enough data
Nancy Pajak + Geneva Ritsch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Cathy Simocko-Smith
42W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Bettina Cosima Larrarte
39W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Kathy Carlson
20W–10L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.93
3
Nancy Pajak
56W–74L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Kelly Stout
29W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Cindy Short
6W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Lora Griffith
38W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Bernita Sterling
71W–106L career · 3 lines in 2025
26%73%<1%
2.59
Geneva Ritsch
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessica Bergen
10W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mariana Treat
6W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.