Teams

Western: Drumlins

2024 65&Over Women · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule13 played
2024-07-25Won 10
W#2 DoublesCynthia Ciarpelli / Juliet Concilla vs MARCY DEMBS / Susan Berger6-3, 7-6
2024-07-18Won 10
W#3 DoublesDeborah Severino / Juliet Concilla vs Linda Murphy / Lynda Otis6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-11Won 10
W#3 DoublesLynda Otis / Marla Share vs Juliet Concilla / Deborah Severino6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2024-07-10vs Liverpool Wild CardsWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Berger / Mary Cawley-Oliver vs Barbara Crane / Shelley Smith6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Greetham / Susan O'Brien vs Linda Breckheimer / Sharyn Eustace6-3, 6-3
2024-06-27Lost 02
L#1 DoublesMARCY DEMBS / Susan Berger vs Shirley Yablonski / Sally Pearson7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDeborah Severino / Juliet Concilla vs Lynda Otis / Linda Murphy1-6, 3-6
2024-06-26vs Liverpool Wild CardsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJuliet Concilla / MARCY DEMBS vs Gillian Epstein / Shelley Smith6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Greetham / Roberta Mangano vs Linda Breckheimer / Sharyn Eustace6-2, 6-0
2024-06-20Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJuliet Concilla / Shirley Yablonski vs Maureen Anderson / Melody Fredrickson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-13Split 11
L#2 DoublesKathleen Jordan / Juliet Concilla vs Gwenn Judge / Kim Waale3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W#3 DoublesMARCY DEMBS / Susan Berger vs Deborah Severino / Cynthia Ciarpelli6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-12vs Liverpool Wild CardsWon 30
W#1 DoublesJuliet Concilla / Susan Berger vs Barbara Crane / Sharyn Eustace6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRoberta Mangano / Marla Share vs Wendy Campbell / Cynthia Clark6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLorraine Boyer / Susan O'Brien vs Linda Breckheimer / Ann Moskalyk6-0, 6-2
2024-06-06Split 11
L#1 DoublesRuth Sikora / Marla Share vs Shirley Yablonski / Sally Pearson1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesAudrey Sauer / Susan Berger vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-05vs Liverpool Wild CardsWon 30
W#1 DoublesLorraine Boyer / MARCY DEMBS vs Barbara Crane / Gillian Epstein7-6, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMary Cawley-Oliver / Marla Share vs Wendy Campbell / Shelley Smith6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKate Artessa / Mary Williams vs Cynthia Clark / Ann Moskalyk6-0, 6-0
2024-05-22vs Liverpool Wild CardsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMARCY DEMBS / Susan Greetham vs Barbara Crane / Shelley Smith6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarla Share / Juliet Concilla vs Cynthia Clark / Sharyn Eustace6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRoberta Mangano / Mary Williams vs Gillian Epstein / Ellie Peavey7-6, 6-4
2024-05-15vs Liverpool Wild CardsWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Cawley-Oliver / Marla Share vs Barbara Crane / Shelley Smith6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLorraine Boyer / Kate Artessa vs Wendy Campbell / Gillian Epstein6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesRoberta Mangano / Mary Williams vs Linda Breckheimer / Sharyn Eustace6-2, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Drumlins60180184
2Liverpool Wild Cards0601836217

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.09 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Susan Berger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.12
Marla Share
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.93
Juliet Concilla
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Kate Artessa
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Lorraine Boyer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
MARCY DEMBS
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
Mary Cawley-Oliver
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Roberta Mangano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Greetham
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Susan O'Brien
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Juliet Concilla + Susan Berger17760% games+6.5% vs expected
Susan O'Brien + Susan Berger4549% gamesnot enough data
Juliet Concilla + Susan O'Brien6260% gamesnot enough data
Juliet Concilla + Mary Cawley-Oliver1638% gamesnot enough data
MARCY DEMBS + Susan Berger3252% gamesnot enough data
Susan O'Brien + Roberta Mangano224 matchesnot enough data
Marla Share + Juliet Concilla303 matchesnot enough data
Marla Share + Mary Cawley-Oliver213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Susan Berger
92W–82L career · 6 lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Marla Share
23W–37L career · 6 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
3.12
3
Juliet Concilla
116W–131L career · 9 lines in 2024
<1%69%31%
2.93
Kate Artessa
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Lorraine Boyer
9W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
MARCY DEMBS
31W–22L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Cawley-Oliver
15W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roberta Mangano
14W–12L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan Greetham
11W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Susan O'Brien
54W–38L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.