Teams

Cambier - Gust

2023 Collier Adult 55 & Over Winter · Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.86 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-06vs Naples Grande - J. FrankWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Gust / Sheila MacNicol vs Meg Perez / Mary Strohmaier6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesBeth Solomon / Amber Hill vs Marie Werthner / Joanne Belcastro7-5, 7-6
2023-02-20vs Pelican Marsh - PrenticeLost 02
L#1 DoublesSheila MacNicol / Lisa Gust vs Cindy Leiding / Kimberly Taylor4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesBeth Solomon / Gordana Robey vs Biqin Teng / Fiona Prentice3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-02-13vs Pelican Bay North - WilsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Gust / Susan Wandler vs Beth Jones / Christina Zajac6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2023-02-06vs Marco YMCA - DiPinoLost 01
L#3 DoublesLisa Gust / Lydia Jackson vs Andrea Washak / Cheryl Solimine2-6, 3-6
2023-02-03vs Grey Oaks - RomanoWon 10
W#3 DoublesCaroline Rogers / Susan Allen vs Carolyn Romano / Linda Smith6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-01-30vs COLLIER / L. KeillorLost 03
L#1 DoublesBeth Solomon / Amber Hill vs Catherine Barsky / Nancy Krueger6-7, 4-6
L#2 DoublesPatricia Wille / Lisa Gust vs Lauren Keillor / Diana Pleeter7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCarol White / Debbie Moses vs Anne Mortillaro / Tasha Christiansen1-6, 3-6
2023-01-16vs Naples Bay Resort - LevineLost 01
L#2 DoublesBeth Solomon / Lisa Gust vs Barbara Tilley / Ellen Schmidt5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2023-01-09vs Island Country Club - A.HeinauerLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol White / Amber Hill vs Mary Nugent / Julie Maly5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Lisa Gust
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Debbie Moses
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Gordana Robey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.54
Amber Hill
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.49
Patricia Wille
published 4
3.37
Caroline Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.26
Carol White
published 3.5
Lydia Jackson
published
Sheila MacNicol
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Lisa Gust
32W–52L career · 6 lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.75
4
Debbie Moses
34W–42L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data
4
Gordana Robey
32W–25L career · 1 line in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Amber Hill
79W–160L career · 3 lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.54
4
Patricia Wille
103W–102L career · no lines in 2023
53%47%<1%
3.49
3.5
Caroline Rogers
149W–130L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Carol White
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.26
Lydia Jackson
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sheila MacNicol
6W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.