Teams

GATA/40/4.5 - 3.5/MUNDY/GATEWOOD

Tri-Level · 40 & Over (4.5-3.5 Men)

9 players · average NTRP 4.25 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-09-08vs UPTA40T/Jacob/GTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Hamilton / Todd Pruette vs Robert Flink / Andrew Jacob6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Windham / Brian Saxon vs David Weise / Marc Verde7-5, 6-0
W#3 DoublesBlake Hamilton / Nick Yarbrough vs James Daniell / Matthew Betit6-0, 6-2
2024-09-08vs SATL40/Phipps/Beech SpringsWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Hamilton / Patrick RICE vs Kenneth Kolakowski / Richard Wallace6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTom Campbell / Philip Nickles vs James Ball / Eric Schulz6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDrew Mundy / Nick Yarbrough vs Scott Phipps / Raymond Barnhart6-0, 6-4
2024-09-07vs SATL40/Phipps/Beech SpringsWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Hamilton / Patrick RICE vs Kenneth Kolakowski / Thomas Wheeler6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesBrian Saxon / Philip Nickles vs Eric Schulz / Manuel Dasilva7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDrew Mundy / Nick Yarbrough vs Raymond Barnhart / Scott Phipps6-0, 6-1
2024-09-07vs UPTA40T/Jacob/GTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesPaul Hamilton / Todd Pruette vs Robert Flink / Glenn Reese6-3, 6-1
L#2 DoublesDavid Windham / Tom Campbell vs Marc Verde / David Weise3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesBlake Hamilton / Nick Yarbrough vs Josh Burton / James Daniell6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over (4.5-3.5 Men) have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Windham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Brian Saxon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.82
Todd Pruette
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Nick Yarbrough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Drew Mundy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gary Agardy
published
Patrick RICE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Hamilton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Philip Nickles
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brian Saxon + Nick Yarbrough224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
David Windham
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
4
Brian Saxon
6W–4L career · type A · 2 lines in 2024
<1%38%62%
4.04
Todd Pruette
8W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
91%9%<1%
3.82
Nick Yarbrough
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.63
Drew Mundy
12W–7L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%61%39%
3.46
Gary Agardy
4W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Patrick RICE
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paul Hamilton
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Philip Nickles
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.