Teams

Highgrove - Wall/Kenny

2025 SCTA Winter '24 · '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 2.92 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for '25 - USTA Adult 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.38
Donna Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.13
Autumn Cheely
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.09
Jenna Hyatt
published
3.04
Brooke Gammill
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Ashley Sams
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.95
Kelli Bailey
published
2.87
Lana Holt
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.79
Elizabeth Imperiale
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Dawn Mount
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Amanda Kenny
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Kristin Schriks
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.52
Emily Wall
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.34
Christina Williams
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 2.5
2.29
Kristen Gosdin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Gammill + Autumn Cheely171951% games+8.9% vs expected
Ashley Sams + Kelli Bailey7356% games+6.8% vs expected
Amanda Kenny + Emily Wall2352% gamesnot enough data
Lana Holt + Donna Jackson5061% gamesnot enough data
Brooke Gammill + Lana Holt224 matchesnot enough data
Amanda Kenny + Kelli Bailey123 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Imperiale + Lana Holt123 matchesnot enough data
Autumn Cheely + Lana Holt033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Donna Jackson
7W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.38
3
Autumn Cheely
33W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%17%83%
3.13
Jenna Hyatt
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
3
Brooke Gammill
27W–35L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
3
Ashley Sams
33W–30L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kelli Bailey
19W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%65%35%
2.95
Lana Holt
15W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
2.87
Elizabeth Imperiale
8W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Dawn Mount
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
3
Amanda Kenny
12W–19L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Kristin Schriks
0W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Emily Wall
12W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
2.52
2.5
Christina Williams
0W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
0%87%13%
2.34
Kristen Gosdin
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
2.29

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.